hardware for Spectrum
ZXNet echo conference «hardware.zx»
From Anton Chaos → To All 17 September 2000
MSGID: 500:812/04.01 26f7dad3
░▒▓▌Hello, All!▐▓▒░
This letter is addressed both to iron workers and to all
to other spektrumists:
A situation arose when the Spectrum hardware upgrade
becomes necessary for its further development (firstly
This also applies to graphics capabilities). For now
moment there are a lot of schemes available, significant possibilities
Spectrum expanding ones, but there are a number of problems that
hinder the implementation of these devices, and which are necessary
discuss:
1. Lack of an organized group producing new devices
for Spectrum.
2. Disproportionate cost of existing devices
Consequently, we are faced with the impossibility of mass
implementation of any device due to the fact that if it is in
sale, then most users cannot buy it, but
if it is developed, then iron workers can assemble it only in
single-knee version, since neither equipment nor
They do not have the capacity for mass production.
There is a certain category of people shouting, “What’s the point in doing
device if no one writes software for it!!!" - of course, under
No one will write anything about a piece of hardware in two copies!!!
although one cannot help but admit that the majority of Spectrum
-compatible machines have brains from 256k and above for a long time, and software
it doesn't use anything (???) :-(I hope there are still people who care about development
Spectrum is not really concerned about the commercial side of the issue, because
practice shows that on Speck commerce is impossible for
Spectrum itself is killer!
I would like to hear a response to this letter and it would be desirable that
If only it weren't a bunch of lines and phrases, like in ZXnet
accepted, but a living human opinion or solution options
problems.
─ ── ───═══════─── ── ─
From Anton Chaos → To Kirill Frolov 22 September 2000
Hello Kirill!
19-09-00, at 06:48:52 hours, wrote Kirill Frolov to Anton Chaos
on the topic "hardware for the Spectrum"
[skip]
KF> This has been discussed here since 1997, but we haven’t reached a consensus yet
I know how much and what is being discussed!
AC>> 1. Lack of an organized group producing new devices
AC>> for Spectrum.
KF> This is not beneficial to anyone.
Not profitable, unfortunately...
AC>> 2. Disproportionate cost of existing devices
KF> It is quite commensurate with the costs, otherwise no one would be doing this.
It is disproportionate _for the user_, in terms of the ratio
possibilities/cost!!!
[skip]
KF> You don’t need more to write software. Think for yourself how many people
KF> does such software usually write? And I say - alone. So the bottom is enough
KF> piece of iron.
So it turns out - a perversion for everyone!!! We need it en masse
think!
AC>> - compatible machines have brains from 256k and above for a long time, and software
AC>> does not use this in any way (???) :-(
KF> But they cannot be used in any way, we can really assume that KF> Spectrum only has 64kb of memory. All jarred extra memory
KF> them here and there, and then the disk eppop and killed everything. I cast the revision
KF> I threw it into the echo, so solder it for yourself.
I may be soldering, but what's the point? There is no software...
AC>> I hope that there are still people who care about development
AC>> Spectrum is not really concerned about the commercial side of the issue, because
KF> This is only if there is a phase shift.
_Not really_ this means a real assessment of your products!
But AY for 200 rubles (I won’t say where) - here it is
Indeed, a complete phase shift!!!
AC>> practice shows that on Speck commerce is impossible even for
AC>> Spectrum itself is deadly!
KF> Yes, it’s not deadly, rather, not even turnover, without commerce
KF> and there would be no Scorpio and all sorts of photos
Yes? How many of us use SMUC or GS or GMX???? Here you go
and commerce - they set the price beyond the limit and are sitting on a pile of boards,
which no one can buy!
[skip]
KF> What kind of problem is this? There is no problem. There is spethrum, here it is
KF> stands on the floor, but what else can you take from it? Something to solder to it KF> this is simply unrealistic, there is no way to develop monsters
KF> knowledge, no strength, no desire. Plus there is such a moment that every thing costs
KF> money, the Spectum will cost more than a pisyuk, because it’s a piece assembly, and
KF> not Chinese consumer goods. You wrote something there about commerce, well, that’s you
KF> I’m not ready to pay myself...
This is the trouble... “no strength, no desire”...
KF> Plus I want to say that you don’t understand a damn thing about hardware, this is nonsense
Guys, you shouldn't shout in vain... they'll laugh...
I have been working with iron my entire adult life...
(albeit somewhat different from the Spectrum - but sometimes that too)
KF> wrote - graphical capabilities cannot be added to him in any way, he
KF> it’s just that a larger screen will not be able to update quickly enough.
In test mode - already... About _graphics_ specifically, no details
went into it - it’s just a major drawback.
KF> He needs 10 times more megahertz and megabytes. well, throw it out there
KF> it's time for the trash heap, they don't even put him in the aon anymore.
What are you daydreaming about! :-\n
KF> And no one will answer your letter with anything smart, even I’m talking nonsense here KF> I’m writing, so forget it all, there won’t be any upgrade for the Spectrum.
I... feel that they won’t answer, but I don’t want to score with something
I really like the Spectrum, more than the PC... (what?)
──────═════════──────
From Kirill Frolov → To Anton Chaos 23 September 2000
*** Answering a msg posted in area X.BAD (Glitches live here).
Press RESET immediately, Anton!
22 Sep 00 01:44, Anton Chaos wrote to Kirill Frolov:
KF>> This has been discussed here since 1997, so there is no consensus
KF>> arrived
AC> I know how much and what is being discussed!
Well, what conclusions did you come to?
AC>>> 2. Disproportionate cost of existing devices
KF>> It is quite commensurate with the costs, otherwise no one would do it
KF>> was studying.
AC> It is disproportionate _for the user_, in terms of ratio
AC> capabilities/cost!!!
Hmm... Everything is proportionate. After all, you are buying a piece of Spectrum,
and not a Chinese counterfeit IBM-PC.
KF>> You don’t need more to write software. Think for yourself how much
KF>> do people usually write such software? And I say - alone. So
KF>> enough and the bottom is iron.
AC> So it turns out - a perversion for everyone!!! We need it en masse
AC> think!
Massively it costs money, which massively needs to be paid for incomprehensibly
which is 20 years out of date. And then there’s no money, there’s fidonet, there’s no internet, there’s no money... AC>>> -compatible machines have brains from 256k and above for a long time, and software
AC>>> does not use this in any way (???) :-(
KF>> But they cannot be used in any way, you can really count them
KF>> that the Spectrum has only 64kb of memory. All 'jar
KF>> extra memory went there and there, and then the disk eppop and everything was killed. I
KF>> I threw the modification into the echo, so solder it for yourself.
AC> Maybe I'm soldering, but what's the point? There is no software...
Do you understand that there is a vicious circle here - there is no software until people solder them and
does not solder until there is software. The circle must be broken one day. For example, I soldered
Most of the improvements were made when there was no software for them yet, but then it appeared
software
KF>> This is only if the shift is in phase.
AC> _Not really_ this means a real assessment of your products!
AC> But AY for 200 rubles (I won’t say where) - here it is
AC> indeed, a complete phase shift!!!
In Scorpio, am I right? This is not a shift, this is its market price.
Antiques have always been expensive.
KF>> Yes, nothing is deadly, most likely even non-reverse, without
KF>> there would be no commerce and Scorpio and all sorts of photos AC> Yes? How many of us use SMUC or GS or GMX????
There are few GMXs, but there are a huge number of SMUCs. There are quite a few GS's too.
AC> So much for commerce - they set the price beyond the limit and are sitting on a heap
AC> boards that no one can buy!
Should we sell them for free? You understand that she stands on her own,
without any markups, it’s also quite a lot. Or rather, it doesn’t cost that much,
It’s just that people don’t have money.
KF>> here he is standing on the floor, but what else can he take from him? There's something about it
KF>> it’s simply unrealistic to solder it, do development
KF>> monsters have neither knowledge, nor strength, nor desire. Plus such a moment
AC> This is the trouble... "no strength, no desire"...
It will take professionals 2 man-years of work to develop the monster,
it takes ten man-years to fine-tune the software. An example is a sprinter.
KF>> wrote - graphical capabilities cannot be added to it in any way
KF>> it’s just that a larger screen will not be able to update
KF>> fast enough.
AC> In test mode - already... No details about _graphics_
AC> went into detail - this is simply the main drawback.On IBM PC I use text mode on average 90% of the time.
And 80x25 (a little wider in golded) is quite enough for me.
KF>> He needs 10 times more megahertz and megabytes. well, the percentage is there
KF>> it's time to throw it in the trash, they don't even put it in aon anymore.
AC> You're daydreaming! :-
This is not me dreaming, these are real requirements for today's computers.
And the Spectrum should be cheap, it cannot compete in the class of expensive cars
can. In short, there is no chance, as it was caused by the brake, it will remain so...
AC> I... feel that they won’t answer, but I don’t want to score,
And you first decided what you generally want from the spectrum.
If it's megabytes and megahertz then it won't work. And in the world of PCs the score is already
moves to gigabytes with gigahertz...
AC> something
AC> I really like the Spectrum, more than the PC... (what?)
Demo machine, nothing more.