Development of a NEW clone

ZXNet echo conference «hardware.zx»

From SfS To All 20 December 2006

Hello oistalker ois> Is there an MMU planned? It would be nice to launch on such a promising one ois> machine, the most advanced axis (I'm talking about Linux). Some kind, let ois> an inferior arithmetic coprocessor would also be nice for ois> floating point calculations. Linux works just fine without an MMU. Only now it is designed for 32 bits...

From acidrain To All 20 December 2006

Hello, Evgeny Muchkin Evg> Because. at the moment there are only 2 people who have done something Evg> and brought this something to a completed design. This is Kamil Karimov and Evg> Roman Chunin. And that's it. Well, not everything, but what about KOE and Pentagon1024?!

From Alexander Melnikov To All 20 December 2006

Hello, falanger fal> IHMO HDD according to the scheme, for example NEMO, needs to be on the board like FDD. I just wanted to say that maybe NEMO-HDD will replace it (not in as an adapter HDD-CF) NEMO-CF/SD. NEMO-HDD pulled out of the slot, stuck NEMO-CF/SD. Or provide the mother with the possibility of turning it off if it built-in And make FDD built-in, just in case. :-)

From Andrey Savichev To All 20 December 2006

Hello MegaMyth Meg> but if you install a separate LCD with a resolution of 640*480 this is also why such a resolution is clearly redundant... I stand in solidarity with those who for compact (pixel-wise) screens in new clones, if this reduces the cost of the hardware. What Spectrum functionality do you base your design on? No answer There is no point in designing for this question. If you want, let's arrange it here poll...only in different options the expected one must be present selling price.

From Roman Dubinin To All 20 December 2006

Hello Lethargeek Let> +1 Let> Let> Let> It would be very interesting to read your documents and compare our projects and Let> their planned characteristics. But you don’t need to say that... Yours, ours... Who is stopping us from uniting? ;)

From Dmitry Malychev To All 20 December 2006

Hello Romanich Rom> But you don’t need to say that... Yours, ours.... Who’s in the way Rom> unite? The terms are conditional, you can put them in quotation marks. :) I mean that I was pushing off from Speck, and you were doing tight pussy axels I was working on it, some people are closer to game consoles...

From Andrey Savichev To All 20 December 2006

Hello andrews I don’t suggest porting Java to the z80, just take a ready-made port for ARM7, it put it on a separate board as a “Java extender” with its local memory and the ability to load it from shared external media via the z80 bus. It will turn out like in the GBA, only there arm7+ is under Z80, and here z80+arm7.

From Sergey Akimov To All 20 December 2006

Hello andrews and> Your 640x480 tools will not be supported and> development. If there were a set of tools that required something like this and> permission existed, I would not doubt the correctness of yours and> the concept of "big screens". and> What is the relationship between software and screen resolution? The software must work through the driver, i.e. You need to write one single tool - a driver. A screen that does not allow 80x25 characters in normal (i.e. readable, not a weak-sighted 3x8 or 4x8) is familiar to no one in the world. On such a screen only play with toys (which has been the case on the ZX from time immemorial). and> 320x240 screens are widely supported by mobile applications - their and> tens and hundreds of millions of pieces have been produced all over the world. Enough and> porting to Java and Spectrum users becomes available to an abyss of ready-made ones and> software. I can’t imagine what these 640x480 will bring except for the rise in price of hardware. An abyss of toys (nerdy because Java)? I don’t even care about existing ones is being played... And no one is porting Java - at today's amateur pace development (one evening once a week) it will be a grandiose long-term construction, which will end in nothing.You need to make a normal 80x25 text (even in graphics) screen and driver standard terminal (for example VT52 and VT100) for it (which is much simpler than Java), you need to set the mode to turn off the ROM from the address space (all 64k - RAM) and with a minimum of effort you will have CP/M, which is already a lot (thousands professionally written programs). 8-bit on Z80 and without CP/M is nonsense. And Java... You can try it later, if it doesn’t work or if it works unsatisfactory in terms of performance (for sure) - well, “well, I couldn’t do it.” :)

From Andrey Savichev To All 20 December 2006

Hello andrews As for the performance of the z80 processor and the system as a whole, there is no 120 MHz will not help you beat even the Pentium90! To watch 320x240 video you will have to install DSP or a ready-made hardware mpeg4 decoder on the programmable logic...and to install the Java interpreter you will have to install ARM7. So such a powerful overclocking is clearly pointless without taking into account how they will the “expanders” are arranged, on which bus they will work.

From Andrey Savichev To All 20 December 2006

Hello, acidrain Your 640x480 development tools will not support it. If If a set of tools requiring such permission existed, I would not I doubted the correctness of your concept of "big screens". Reality is is as follows (in the absence of powerful iron producers): you give me a kit for assembly with a minimum of chips - I make a board using them kitchen on the knee. 320x240 screens are widely supported by mobile applications - they have been released tens and hundreds of millions of pieces all over the world. It is enough to port Java and A wealth of ready-made software becomes available to spektrumists. What will these 640x480 give? I can't think of anything other than making the hardware more expensive.

From Andrey Savichev To All 20 December 2006

Hello, Error404 Err> What is the relationship between software and screen resolution? the most direct thing :)... otherwise why be everyone there Windows Mobile...the libraries all need to be changed...Laser Basic and others can’t work with such a graphic screen... Of course, I’ll say something seditious, but CP/M is not relevant today. The new Spectrum is the best it can be; it’s an inexpensive multimedia and gaming device computer, approaching relatively modern (-1 generation) consoles in desktop, and when LCD (OLED) screens are turned on and portable, differing from (some of them) for the better by the possibility of a database for storage gaming and multimedia content. This is exactly what you need for creativity. Trying to turn it into a computer for closed corporate networks can also be fruitful. What can CP/M be used for today? Text only The screen is only needed by journalists (to read books, magazines and newspapers without graphics not interesting either). Of course, you can use it as a terminal, but how many That's how it's used. A line of 40 characters is not that big limitation when it comes to titles of compositions, titles of books, etc.

From acidrain To All 20 December 2006

Hello andrews and> this is also why such permission is clearly redundant... No, not too much! How long can you develop software on PC due to the fact that You don’t want to break your eyes and there’s not enough information on the screen? It's time to think about yourself, without Without unnecessary body movements, you will be able to work comfortably on the spec. No need limit yourself, these are not the times! Sinclair used to save on everything and I made such a “color” spec screen, then after all (spec on the M68K processor) that’s all fixed it! Gentlemen, think before you build concepts. And there is no need for these topics here! Sentences other than "let's talk to a couple more weeks, we will arrange a survey, which will not give results (since surveys are compiled extremely incorrect) and we’ll forget about this topic as soon as another one appears” will follow? MMU has already been proposed. Interrupt manager? Memory limitation (1-4GB). New Video Controller, maximum of everything external (extension cards)...

From ASDT To All 20 December 2006

Hello MegaMyth Again they sculpted an under-RS... Give at least 1 justification why they are needed such modes and frequencies. And not based on what you want... And if there is an objective perspective of the transition on modern LCD monitors, why is this does it mean the need for a “new screen” on the spec? Resolution 320x240...I made it for myself. Why? First, no one came forward to defend old border, i.e. now he can't be acquitted. Second - when expanding memory to 256k additional hardware cost for expansion screen - one or two microcircuits.

From ASDT To All 21 December 2006

Hello MegaMyth "Do you understand that the counters of different clones are reset and loaded by different constants" It can be divided into pages... And this was not significant. Program clumsy and so on... well, even more varieties of clumsy :)

From Dmitry Demyanenko To All 21 December 2006

Hello ASDT ASD> How the counter counts... Which area ASD> the horizontal/frame pulse will fall out, so it will be... Do you understand that counters for different clones are reset and loaded differently? constants, and that the same mode, for example, will not work on Pentagon or Kay

From Dmitry Demyanenko To All 21 December 2006

Hello ASDT Well, there was a similar joke from AlCo called 384x304, it’s even something for this purpose implemented, also a principle similar to what you described

From Ivan Mak To All 28 February 2007

Hello, DIMA 1 DIM> And why is everything quiet????? And Spectrum will not appear at 24 MHz and higher ???? “give me $999K, and you’ll have a Spectrum at least at 100MHz” (c) :)

From Alexey Zhabin To All 28 February 2007

Hello, WingLion Win> "give me $999K, and you will have a Spectrum at least at 100MHz" (c) :) +1

From Dmitry Mikhailovich Gorbunov To All 28 February 2007

Hello, WingLion And why is everything quiet????? And the Spectrum will not appear at 24 MHz and higher????

From Mark Antonov To All 28 February 2007

Hello, WingLion Win> "give me $999K just that???