Black_ Cat answers on the topic of CHIMERA in the ZX structure

Hello hero I deleted everything I wrote in that topic myself, so as not to interrupt the flight. the author's thoughts with his delusional flame. Geniuses must be respected and cherished. Without them the platform is doomed to destruction.

Hello Lennon len> is also our platform Don't confuse our platform with his.

Hello Lennon Have pity on the moderators, I'm already sorry for them :)

Hello Lennon I would say this topic is not for this section, otherwise you won’t force it anyway if a person does not want to write his point of view and it is useless to prove something, there is another way that does not contradict the point of view of BlackCat not to write there, let him develop the flow, although IMHO his post is long ago and far away went beyond the scope of the "Iron" topic. And by the way, you also provoke if you don’t delete So move your post to another thread.

Hello, All Moderators please move this to the "miscellaneous" section! I didn't find another suitable section. Flame, in my opinion, is not suitable, because the position was defended constructively, there is no simply senseless chatter, at least on my part. It would be a shame if they transferred it to flame :mad; Because of; unjustified deletion of answers by the author, supposedly offtopic: v2_crazy; ,; I'm creating a thread for deleted replies! So that many new, and possibly old, members our community could see the discussion of CHIMERA in full! Here you can also post answers from other authors who believe that their answers were constructive and undeservedly removed! P.S. deleting replies to a topic, in my opinion, is disrespectful to the forum members and to the forums itself! This is something like a boycott! Everyone has the right to a point of view and if there are no blanket insults, but just criticism, then deletion is inappropriate, This goes against the purpose of the forum! They answer the person, waste time and effort, and he slams and deletes! :v2_jawdr; Quote:; Message from Black Cat I once really liked ZX and it’s even more offensive that this platform never received its reincarnation in the new hardware. And this happened only one at a time reason - due to the lack of an adequate concept of its development consistent with global trends in the development of digital technology. In my opinion this is not so! The reason is completely different! It's sad, butSpectrum lost popularity for exactly the same reason it purchased, only with a minus sign. The fact is that the very absence of adequate the concept was objective. Isn’t it clear that the Spectrum died a death? brave, like his competitors at the very moment when the era of home ended class... Initially, the market was divided roughly into three parts, large gigantic computing complexes, full-fledged personal computers with fully equipped, and home class, which, due to the high degree of fire, was cheap and accessible to the average person! As soon as progress reached a level at which a full-fledged computer became accessible, the home class has been given a long life, including those related to it ZX... The concept for the development of ZX could not objectively exist and it could not be created now even more so impossible! This is a perpetual mobile, a kind of... ZX was originally conceived this way, how overnight it became meaningless and unnecessary! If he had an adequate development concept designed for many years, how as you put it, it simply wouldn’t be a ZX Spectrum, it would be something like IBM or Macintosh and we would never have clones of this platform in our country warm apartments. Although there were some attempts at this, in particular Sinclair tried to create model with a flat monitor and this thought was correct, but there is still time forit didn't come. And perhaps if we could create a flat monitor, then perhaps on one of the coolest laptops on a Motorola or z380 processor the inscription would be: th 1982 Sinclair Research Ltd Quote: Message from Black_Cat This historical period was not meant and is not interesting in principle. In the USSR ZX fell after his death at the hands of Sir Clive (and the time machine also moment, in order to give Sir a retrospective abortion has not yet been invented). The population of the USSR is only concerned about our own dead. In the USSR from With the advent of the ZX, the era of Home Computers has just begun and is being discussed accordingly concepts of only domestic ZX-building. And again I disagree! In the USSR and then in Russia, the Spectrum lived a little longer, only because of backwardness of this region! And not because of some concept... structure it didn’t exist at all, the guys created clones to make extra money! What's not here? understand? And the closer it was to the branded spec and the cheaper it was, the more earnings... Well, I don’t count the later guys who developed there for the soul, ATM for example, etc. Quote: Message from Black_Cat By the time the ZX was released, the very concept of a personal computer was only 5 years old. arose (according to some sources), and what “years” are we talking about then? Reasoning for In this situation, talking about “long years” are as meaningless as planning forIn what year will a newborn baby receive the Nobel Prize? The fact of the matter is that it’s already been 5 years! plus those 10 that existed spec the personal computer evolved and eventually, by the early 1990s, a simple PC has become available to almost anyone... And if possible, this simple PCs based on 286 were ahead of the spec by several heads. The Spectrum was not created as a computer that would develop from the very beginning, the maximum of its development is the transition to color images and enlargement RAM, he didn’t go any further... After all, there were a lot of companies that released on different platforms, where are they all? That everyone had a general director like Sinclair, who suffered from nonsense? Many reasons can be found besides the concept development due to which the spectrum group lost popularity, for example, compatibility.... There was also such a common phrase as the communist slogan: IBM compatible!!! Do you think they just blurted it out like that out of stupidity? Quote: Message from Black_Cat Sinclair was delirious, and his delirium haunts some still inflamed minds. The only thing he did consciously was pump money into his pockets. Perhaps he was too ambitious, but much more rational than you. At least At least the idea of a compact computer with a flat monitor has now been implemented and in demand! And a lot of users are switching from regular computers to laptops,including me, I’ll be moving on in another year! And the creation of electric vehicles and flint technologies - all of these are generally the right directions and have partly already found their place in our lives or will be found in the future... Are you trying to create a prepeto mobile? How can you make some other computer that will be in more demand? than the one from which you use components and architecture... To create something new, you need to introduce something new, where in your project novelty? The funny thing is that you are creating something that already exists under the promoted a brand attaching to it a long-forgotten name that few people remember.... No matter how you look at your project, it’s baby talk! If this is just fantasy and creativity, then you can understand, and our forum is possible This is what it was created for, but no one will ever take this seriously!!! Quote: Message from Black_Cat This section is for discussing concepts, ideologies and paths of development, i.e. ideas. Nothing here don't design Oh, well, if you're just thinking... I thought you seriously wanted to expand production! Well, sorry then! P.S. but in general I didn’t attribute anything. It simply follows logically from the fact that what is written in the manual. Then you just need to bring the reader to the topic more precisely and directed so that he does not deviate from the thought that you are building. Quote: Message from Black_CatThe fact that you are incapable of taking anything seriously is already evident from a couple of your posts - except for unfounded statements, distortions of facts and fabrications There is nothing in them that borders on outright slander. Therefore, convincing please do not strain yourself with such opuses in this topic, it is not welcome and They are not welcome here. From now on, all your fabrications will be regarded as conscious slander with corresponding organizational conclusions Well, it’s just that you’re afraid to face the truth. Facts that were pretended to be real in one’s own skin are difficult to distort. If you read my story about how I encountered the Spectrum, in the section tell us about yourself, you will see how I described from the memories of those years when Spectrum was just starting to die, this whole process. After all, everyone began to move on the PC, not on the Amiga or the Commander or whatever they called him, but on the PC. Spectirum and Sinclair are not the culprits here, but the victims! Moreover, the sale by Sinclair The Amstrad Spectrum does not look like anything when viewed this way. wrong move. The man who created a company and made a name for himself with it products, probably not such a fool... Apparently after the failure of several ambitious ideas, he felt that he would not be able to offer anything new and in demand, which, just like the Spectrum in its time, can amount to competition for the up and coming PC. How do you think? I personally after reading everythingstories about Sinclair I see it exactly like that! The easiest way is to say that a person is a fool and crazy, talking nonsense and doing stupid steps. P.S. And don’t say that you didn’t say anything that I attribute to you. This simply involuntarily logically follows from what you write! You can’t just think abstractly about the structure of something.... So at one time they came to the conclusion that the moon is a disk, and then when smart people began to say that this was impossible, it must be a ball, in response to them They said, look, it’s flat, why are you inventing and distorting the facts! It’s flat, why invent it! To the bonfire of heretics! Quote: Message from Black_Cat It would be very wonderful if you really started THINKING, everyone from this would be easier. In my opinion, this is really slander and distortion of facts.... Quote: Posted by Southern Bear This is pure flame. No, he just got confused himself. He wanted one thing first, but the flood was under pressure the public has already come up with another idea Well, it’s not scary, on our forum creativity is welcomed, and invention is This is one of the parts of creativity! Quote: Posted by Southern Bear Creativity in the field of fiction? Well, at least it’s also useful for the development of both the author and the reader.

Hello Southern Bear Sou> Do not confuse our platform with his. Do not confuse the platform with its chimera construction.

Hello Southern Bear Sou> I deleted everything I wrote in that topic myself, so as not to interrupt Sou> afftor's flight of thoughts with his delusional flame. Geniuses must be respected and Sou> cherish. Without them, the platform is doomed to death I deleted it too, since he doesn’t want to let him debate with himself: v2_tong2:

Hello hero her> And by the way, you also provoke if you don’t delete it and move it to another her> thread your post. And initially his topic was far from hardware... Let the moderator move it, if the topic has gone beyond the scope, then this is the topic :)

Hello hero her> Have pity on the moderators, I’m already sorry for them Well, what kind of disrespect is this? Why delete the answers then? Some kind of kindergarten, this it's a forum! They answered him, they tried, but he spits in response! Just rudeness.

Hello Lennon len> P.S. deleting replies to a topic, in my opinion, is disrespect len> members of the forum and the forums themselves! This is something like a boycott! Everyone len> has the right to have a point of view, and if there are no blanket insults, then len> is just criticism, then deletion is inappropriate, it goes against the meaning len> forum! len> They answer a person, waste time and effort, and he slams and deletes! len> :v2_jawdr; len>; Dear, ignore this topic and no one will delete anything, let The author corresponds with himself there. For example, I didn’t even try to write anything there, because I think the topic is complete nonsense not worthy of attention, with such “moderation”. I’m already a fan of “crazy projects”, but my fellow countryman here is far from me surpassed. :v2_clapp; Resting...; :v2_sick; Yes; my fellow countryman won’t be offended by me, he just expressed his sore point IMHO, so I've been following this topic from time to time.

Hello Lennon I suggest everyone delete their posts from there :D

Hello Mike This topic will soon be relegated to flame since it has nothing to do with hardware relationships. Everyone has their own point of view... I deleted from the current topic messages containing attacks and rudeness attitude both towards the author and from the author himself, I don’t know who deleted what yet... Although I didn’t understand what the author wanted to say, and I’m not trying to understand. And to reject unclear is not the best.