xtr-os ;-)

Hello, Dmitry! 18-02-98 at 04:59 Dmitry Lomov wrote to Oleg Grigoriev on topic "Iron News [re: Scorp and Kai]". DL>>> We need a system. The system saves time. OG>> I know. Even in that (don’t spit) dosage it turns out to be significant - OG>> but faster. DL> Yes. It's only worth spending a couple of months studying once DL> meager help and testing the first options at random... On the contrary. Helps are studied for several days, then information is being sorted out. Mixed with abuse against the writer, lei helpov. OG>> write a system. By the way, what stage are you at? On "bu- OG>> significant" or is there already something tangible? DL> hehe... the screen I sent :) And which remained stagnant somewhere. Throw it at Boris at 2 o'clock Chi, I'll call you at 3 and pick it up. Or on FARAON. But the first one is better. DL> Nothing on paper yet. It's all in the head. And in endless bazaars at night DL> by phone... Miracles, urgently write down everything that you managed to come up with. It will be easier for you later. DL> beak in vain. We decided - each task is assigned its own stack at the bottom, DL> and she must report its size.What a horror. DL> All system calls DL> from a task use its own stack. Stack depth for any system DL> operations will be documented. There is nothing for you to do.;) IMHO one big stack for everyone and everything. DL> Also, initially they wanted to make reentrant libraries - like on the Amiga. DL> But what did you think it would cost us DL> rejection of self-modifying code and commands like LD (...),A/HL... And isdos knows how. True, there seems to be no self-modifying Xia code. DL> We decided not to do it. If one subroutine is called by one task and DL> works, another task will not be able to access it until the first one DL> finishes. Brake or error? Probably better brake. DL> Nightmare, isn't it? These are the kind of markets we run... DL> How many more bazaars will there be along the way?.. When you have something to say and something to answer... Then why not not to say? ;-))) Best wishes, Oleg aka Ruiner. -+- Shoot-Edit v6.06

I’m sitting here, reading, and suddenly I see Valentin Pimenov writes to Oleg Grigoriev... Hi Valentin! OG> Or something else. Should ASM always count OG> (I don’t think this will have much impact on performance) or OG> by special. team. Those. assembly directive. VP> can be like dos on pc. if you don’t know, then the person should do it himself VP> set the stack size. Those. writes: VP> aaa segment stack VP> ds ??? VP> aaa ends what are you driving? which ones in...ds? if your program stack is not more than 256 bytes, then you don’t need to write anything at all. if more then .STACK n <- and the jump must be selected. VP> imho, this can also be done. plus there’s no need to change the ASM too much. on PC there is such a feature: enter n,m and leave, the first command reserves space on the stack, the second one cleans it up. although on spec it's not real. ▌█▐▐║▌█▐▐▌▐ W!7h 7he Be$7 W!$he$ fR0M CREATOR product ▌812/03.00▐ Powered by Cyrix 6x86L 200/16DIMM/S3TrV2 2Mb/SBPro/Q1.6Gb/USR33.6