what kind of team is this?
ZXNet echo conference «code.zx»
From 500:812/00.00 → To All 23 April 1998
Hi, All!
Can anyone tell me what kind of command this is?
#ED #10???
She actively uses the scorpion monitor
(under the mule) in prof-pz.
The mule calls this team "SPM"...
It looks like this command causes a transition
somewhere!!!!!
Therefore, a question to ALL:
Is there a live scorpion with a trade unionist?
this team?
Look for her in the 8th bank...
Well that's all
*MAS* with a sledgehammer
-+- handles [left and right]
From Michael Kondratyev → To Aleksandr Majorov 1 June 1998
Hi Alexander,
In a message of to Oleg Sazonov (), you wrote:
AM>> Mul calls this command "SPM"...
AM>> It looks like this command causes a transition
AM>> somewhere!!!!!
OS> strange, this should be like jr,rst? ;)
AM> most likely this is a “purely mule” team....
AM> PS! need to check!
AM> software control on the mule!!!
Actually, this is some kind of special gag made for incompatibility with
real iron. must make procedure calls from additional pages
ROM probably represents some kind of protection against the possibility of debugging
service monitor when using the demo version of the debugger.
Bye, Michael.
From Michael Kondratyev → To Aleksandr Majorov 1 July 1998
Hi Alexander,
In a message of to Michael Kondratyev (), you wrote:
AM> PS: maybe then _finally_ no dockets/descriptions of restarts/...
AM> not needed? Let those who are “able” search for themselves?
yes; or prove your condition and “there is no life without” to someone who has: perhaps
you'll get something.
AM> this is of course offtopic, but _how_ are 98 vents better than the previous ones?
of course offtopic, but about the same as osr2 is better than 4.00.950
AM> i.e. let the screw work slowly through TR-DOS, no one will be able to count
AM> date in ASCII, etc.?
MK> those who wish. Are you sure that there will be at least a dozen of the latter? but it is necessary
MK> type more, much more, not by one order of magnitude.
AM> everyone who wants does not have hemorrhoids with this, but writes their own paragraphs, instead
AM> already available...
that is precisely why no one will be able to count the date, etc. - at least turn to someone
You should at least express your displeasure.
AM> sorry, but we are talking about _SCORP_, and about the _documented_ restart!
yes, but in general it is of little use: according to the mind, it would be necessary to specify a format string at the input.
therefore we can say that this is a restart that is in the stage of (eternal) development
;) AM> what does Unix have to do with it?
not Unix, but its date format. very useful.
AM> so I compared, direct access to the Kmosu, the addresses of which are not known,
AM> (or rather, not described - for some reason no one except you has seen them anywhere!)
AM> and the described access, which is slow and does not work correctly...
It works correctly for you, but it’s not a problem.
; ***proc
; parm: ---
; value : cf==busy
; nc==read, hl=&bf[6]
; modify: af bc de hl
_rtc_try_read: ld de, 0x3FF3 ;in
ld bc, 0x3FF0 ;out
ld (@@rtc_tryrd_sp+1), sp
ld hl, @@rtc_tryrd_fin
push hl
push de
push bc
ld hl, @@rtc_tryrd_inc
push hl
push de
push bc
push hl
push de
push bc
push hl
push de
push bc
ld hl, @@rtc_tryrd_add2
push hl
push de
push bc push hl
push de
push bc
push hl
push de
push bc
ld hl, @@rtc_tryrd_tst
push hl
push de
push bc
ld a, 0x0A
ld hl, @@rtc_tryrd_bf
ld e, 0
ld bc, 0xDFBA
di
jp 0x3D30
@@rtc_tryrd_bf: ds 7
@@rtc_tryrd_tst: add a, a
ld a, e
jp nc, 0x3D30
ei
@@rtc_tryrd_sp: ld sp, 0
ret
@@rtc_tryrd_fin: ei
ld (hl), a
ret
@@rtc_tryrd_add2: ld (hl), a
inc hl
ld a, 2
add a, e
ld e, a
jp 0x3D30
@@rtc_tryrd_inc: ld (hl), a
inc hl
inc e
ld a, e
jp 0x3D30
; *** end proc
Bye, Michael.
From Oleg Grigoriev → To Michael Kondratyev 4 July 1998
Hello Michael!
01-07-98 at 14:16:54 Michael Kondratyev => Oleg Grigoriev:
OG>> And I have my own driver, compatible with yours.;)
MK> what's the point? Was there something I didn’t have (was it wrong)? but then why are you silent?
Naturally there was a point. :) And the glitch is not yours, but Larchenkovsky’s.
During intensive threshing with a screw, one of the rst8 prohibited
interruptions.
Happened, for example, when assembling a fairly large
source file (asm has nothing to do with it - this happened with ordinary copying
NI). Once every 2-3 days, a thorough examination is carried out.
Accordingly, after all rst #08:defb #81 I put ei.
Then I rewrote the not optimally written reading and writing block
(merged). The blocker turned out to be 35 bytes shorter than yours. :-)
Why didn't you tell me? Well, I asked a couple of people, they have this...
It didn’t show up, so I “calmed down.”
But now nothing hangs. :)
Best wishes, Oleg aka Ruiner.