From
Vladimir Larkov
→
To
Paul Falcon
27 September 1997
Hello Paul!
Thu 25-Sep-97 01:21, Paul Falcon (2:5030/529.13) wrote a letter to Vladimir
Larkov:
PF>>> threw it into the Spectrofon 22,23 file,
VL>> Dima Grigoriev aka Oldman? He is more of a pisishnik than an Amigaist.
PF> ... and who threw it the first time? isn't it you?
Me: Only in password-protected archives.
[...]
VL>> I personally did not advise them to buy these either. Money down the drain.
PF> They earn money.
Well done. Just spending them on distribution kits for the spectrophone is mediocre.
PF>>> do you think _is_normal_?
VL>> What is this? Spectrophone 8 tons? Seems inexpensive.
PF> Vova, you understand that this is not good
PF> throw software (licensed) into the echo file.
A password-protected archive is a thing that cannot be unpacked without a password. I
I already wrote about this in zx - I probably really should have put it in these
archives of naked women, then this would really be the best provocation of the year.
PF> by the way, it seems like the rules prohibit throwing software
PF> less than a year ago.
No.
PF> You can’t live your whole life on stolen software. His own
PF> people write, spending both time and money on it. PF> Or maybe you have your own worldview
PF> for software?
IMHO if people want their magazine not to be copied left and right, they will
protect (at least ZXF). These same figures hammered home the defense - the theme was this
- spend $600 and do whatever you want. They received their money from those who gave them
I paid THEM this money to give a damn, why should ME not be purple? Those who
I paid them money, I didn’t think it was stupid to spend money on a product without protection.
Should I think for them?
I have a rule - I do not distribute software that is given to me with a condition
non-proliferation. Nobody asked me not to distribute SPFs.
PF> If they threw demos into the echo then this
PF> I think no one has any special rights.
PF> Maybe you’ll get rid of digital doom?
Let's see ;)
PF> ps. I have no complaints about the Amiga.
Me too ;)
With best wishes, Vladimir.
From
812/03.00
→
To
Vladimir Larkov
27 September 1997
Hi Vladimir!
PF>>>> threw it into the Spectrofon 22,23 file,
VL>>> Dima Grigoriev aka Oldman? He is more of a pisishnik than an Amigaist.
PF> ... and who threw it the first time? isn't it you?
VL> Ya. Only in password-protected archives.
unarj seems to be a program called, for
an hour on any stump will try all the passwords, so
which is not scary...
PF>> Vova, you understand that this is not good
PF>> throw software (licensed) into the echo file.
VL> A password-protected archive is a thing that cannot be accessed without a password
VL> is unpacked. I already wrote about this in zx - I probably really do
VL> you should have put naked women in these archives, then it would really be
VL> best provocation of the year.
see above
PF>> You can’t live your whole life on stolen software. His own
PF>> people write, spending both time and money on it.
PF>> Or maybe you have your own worldview
PF>> to software?
VL> IMHO if people want their magazine not to be copied from right to left, they do
VL> it is protected (at least by ZXF). These same figures scored a bolt on defense - topic VL> it was like this - take $600 and do what you want. They got their money
VL> they don’t give a damn about those who paid them this money, why should it not be for ME
VL> purple? Those who paid them money did not think that it was stupid to spend money
VL> for a product without protection. Should I think for them?
Ideally, if the product has
copyrights and prohibition on distribution, then
it cannot be copied. And no
no need for protection.
VL> I have a rule - I do not distribute software that is given to me with a condition
VL> non-proliferation. Nobody asked me not to distribute SPF.
Specially for you, every manufacturer
software in the world should send a notification
that you don't spread it
software?
PF>> If they threw demos into the echo, then this is it
PF>> in my opinion no one has any special rights.
PF>> Maybe you’ll get rid of digital doom?
PF>> ps. I have no complaints about the Amiga.
VL> Me too ;)
still...
▌▌║▌█▐│▌▌▐▐ WiTh The BeST wIsheS fROM
▌▌║▌█▐│▌▌▐▐ *C*R*E*A*T*O*R*
▌812/03.00▐
-+- zxasm+ positive
From
Vladimir Larkov
→
To
Roman Alexandrov
29 September 1997
Hello Roman!
Mon 29-Sep-97 00:35, Roman Alexandrov (2:5030/168.56@fidonet) wrote a letter
Paul Falcon:
PF>> unarj like the program is called , for
RA> unarj - unpacks *.RAR archives, does not select passwords.
Is Pisyuk messing with your brain too? It always seemed to me that unARJ is a program for
*.arj, and *.rar unpacks are unpacked either by rar.exe or unRAR.
With best wishes, Vladimir.
From
812/03.00
→
To
Vladimir Larkov
30 September 1997
Hi Vladimir!
VL>>> Ya. Only in password-protected archives.
PF>> unarj like the program is called , for
PF>> an hour on any stump will try all the passwords, so
PF>> which is not scary...
VL> 4hf?
^^^
and who can decipher for me what it is?
VL>>> A password-protected archive is a thing that cannot be accessed without a password
VL>>> is unpacked. I already wrote about this in zx - I probably really
VL>>> you should have put naked women in these archives, then it would have been real
VL>>> was the best provocation of the year.
PF>> see above
VL> In fact, there is a breaker, but the trick is that it doesn’t break anything.
Explain this to hacker Chris, he said
that breaks, and quickly. I am this
I haven’t seen anything, I can’t say anything myself
I can .
PF>> Ideally, if they stand on the product
PF>> copyrights and prohibition on distribution, then
PF>> it cannot be copied. And none
PF>> no protection needed.
VL> "Start with yourself"? Shall we go through your stock of warez? Everything that (see ^^^) you
VL> will you delete it immediately with reformatting?And once Y. Gutnik called me, and they delayed
conversation about software, I took floppy disks and
started going through...
ZX FORMAT 3,4,4.5,5,6 - faces.
Faultles persons.
the turn persons
fiveteens persons.
magic stripes faces.
spectrofon(s) persons.
everything was purchased from Logros/donated by the authors.
I don’t have any other similar programs
no (copyright), there were several here under cpm
disks (purchased from Vicks) and then took them from
friend of persons since the first ones were also buggy.
although is-dos copied...
well and ufo too... I think one
disc of 10 is not very scary, although for
I’m _ashamed_ because I myself
I'm trying to do it and imagining how it would be
it’s difficult when one program takes
half a year
VL> In order not to bore readers with a fruitless discussion about the presence of breakers
VL> passwords in five minutes, let's conduct an experiment. I give it to you
VL> password-protected app and these five minutes. If you don't reveal it, no one will hold your tongue
VL> pulled.
I can’t reveal anything, there’s nowhere...
In general, the conversation reached a dead end, but
Oldman's letter seemed to me that they
This password was simply guessed in 30 minutes.
quote: "you would have put ... last"
seems like it, so let's close the topic
we won't get anywhere anyway.
▌▌║▌█▐│▌▌▐▐ WiTh The BeST wIsheS fROM
▌▌║▌█▐│▌▌▐▐ *C*R*E*A*T*O*R*
▌812/03.00▐
-+- zxasm+ positive
From
Michael Kondratyev
→
To
Paul Falcon
13 November 1997
Hello Paul!
Sat Sep 27 1997, Paul Falcon concocted a letter to Vladimir Larkov:
PF>> ... and who threw it the first time? isn't it you?
VL>> Ya. Only in password-protected archives.
PF> unarj like the program is called , for
PF> an hour on any stump will try all the passwords, so
PF> which is not scary...
archive pap 2.0, password >10chars - you’ll be sorting through something like this for a couple of years.
With best wishes, Michael.
From
Roman Alexandrov
→
To
Vladimir Larkov
15 March 1998
Hello, Vladimir!
September 27, 1997, 04:08, Vladimir Larkov wrote to Paul Falcon on the topic
"Spectrum or PC.":
PF>>>> threw it into the Spectrofon 22,23 file,
VL>>> Dima Grigoriev aka Oldman? He is more of a pisishnik than an Amigaist.
PF>> ... and who threw it the first time? isn't it you?
VL> Ya. Only in password-protected archives.
[skipped]
VL> A password-protected archive is a thing that cannot be accessed without a password
VL> is unpacked. I already wrote about this in zx - I probably really
VL> you should have put naked women in these archives, then it would really exist
VL> best provocation of the year.
Honestly speaking, I still don’t understand why you did this?
[skipped]
Happy connections.
Roman.
March 15, 1998, already 11:36