Spectrum or PC.

ZXNet echo conference «code.zx»

From Vladimir Larkov To Paul Falcon 27 September 1997

Hello Paul! Thu 25-Sep-97 01:21, Paul Falcon (2:5030/529.13) wrote a letter to Vladimir Larkov: PF>>> threw it into the Spectrofon 22,23 file, VL>> Dima Grigoriev aka Oldman? He is more of a pisishnik than an Amigaist. PF> ... and who threw it the first time? isn't it you? Me: Only in password-protected archives. [...] VL>> I personally did not advise them to buy these either. Money down the drain. PF> They earn money. Well done. Just spending them on distribution kits for the spectrophone is mediocre. PF>>> do you think _is_normal_? VL>> What is this? Spectrophone 8 tons? Seems inexpensive. PF> Vova, you understand that this is not good PF> throw software (licensed) into the echo file. A password-protected archive is a thing that cannot be unpacked without a password. I I already wrote about this in zx - I probably really should have put it in these archives of naked women, then this would really be the best provocation of the year. PF> by the way, it seems like the rules prohibit throwing software PF> less than a year ago. No. PF> You can’t live your whole life on stolen software. His own PF> people write, spending both time and money on it. PF> Or maybe you have your own worldview PF> for software? IMHO if people want their magazine not to be copied left and right, they will protect (at least ZXF). These same figures hammered home the defense - the theme was this - spend $600 and do whatever you want. They received their money from those who gave them I paid THEM this money to give a damn, why should ME not be purple? Those who I paid them money, I didn’t think it was stupid to spend money on a product without protection. Should I think for them? I have a rule - I do not distribute software that is given to me with a condition non-proliferation. Nobody asked me not to distribute SPFs. PF> If they threw demos into the echo then this PF> I think no one has any special rights. PF> Maybe you’ll get rid of digital doom? Let's see ;) PF> ps. I have no complaints about the Amiga. Me too ;) With best wishes, Vladimir.

From 812/03.00 To Vladimir Larkov 27 September 1997

Hi Vladimir! PF>>>> threw it into the Spectrofon 22,23 file, VL>>> Dima Grigoriev aka Oldman? He is more of a pisishnik than an Amigaist. PF> ... and who threw it the first time? isn't it you? VL> Ya. Only in password-protected archives. unarj seems to be a program called, for an hour on any stump will try all the passwords, so which is not scary... PF>> Vova, you understand that this is not good PF>> throw software (licensed) into the echo file. VL> A password-protected archive is a thing that cannot be accessed without a password VL> is unpacked. I already wrote about this in zx - I probably really do VL> you should have put naked women in these archives, then it would really be VL> best provocation of the year. see above PF>> You can’t live your whole life on stolen software. His own PF>> people write, spending both time and money on it. PF>> Or maybe you have your own worldview PF>> to software? VL> IMHO if people want their magazine not to be copied from right to left, they do VL> it is protected (at least by ZXF). These same figures scored a bolt on defense - topic VL> it was like this - take $600 and do what you want. They got their money VL> they don’t give a damn about those who paid them this money, why should it not be for ME VL> purple? Those who paid them money did not think that it was stupid to spend money VL> for a product without protection. Should I think for them? Ideally, if the product has copyrights and prohibition on distribution, then it cannot be copied. And no no need for protection. VL> I have a rule - I do not distribute software that is given to me with a condition VL> non-proliferation. Nobody asked me not to distribute SPF. Specially for you, every manufacturer software in the world should send a notification that you don't spread it software? PF>> If they threw demos into the echo, then this is it PF>> in my opinion no one has any special rights. PF>> Maybe you’ll get rid of digital doom? PF>> ps. I have no complaints about the Amiga. VL> Me too ;) still... ▌▌║▌█▐│▌▌▐▐ WiTh The BeST wIsheS fROM ▌▌║▌█▐│▌▌▐▐ *C*R*E*A*T*O*R* ▌812/03.00▐ -+- zxasm+ positive

From Vladimir Larkov To Roman Alexandrov 29 September 1997

Hello Roman! Mon 29-Sep-97 00:35, Roman Alexandrov (2:5030/168.56@fidonet) wrote a letter Paul Falcon: PF>> unarj like the program is called , for RA> unarj - unpacks *.RAR archives, does not select passwords. Is Pisyuk messing with your brain too? It always seemed to me that unARJ is a program for *.arj, and *.rar unpacks are unpacked either by rar.exe or unRAR. With best wishes, Vladimir.

From 812/03.00 To Vladimir Larkov 30 September 1997

Hi Vladimir! VL>>> Ya. Only in password-protected archives. PF>> unarj like the program is called , for PF>> an hour on any stump will try all the passwords, so PF>> which is not scary... VL> 4hf? ^^^ and who can decipher for me what it is? VL>>> A password-protected archive is a thing that cannot be accessed without a password VL>>> is unpacked. I already wrote about this in zx - I probably really VL>>> you should have put naked women in these archives, then it would have been real VL>>> was the best provocation of the year. PF>> see above VL> In fact, there is a breaker, but the trick is that it doesn’t break anything. Explain this to hacker Chris, he said that breaks, and quickly. I am this I haven’t seen anything, I can’t say anything myself I can . PF>> Ideally, if they stand on the product PF>> copyrights and prohibition on distribution, then PF>> it cannot be copied. And none PF>> no protection needed. VL> "Start with yourself"? Shall we go through your stock of warez? Everything that (see ^^^) you VL> will you delete it immediately with reformatting?And once Y. Gutnik called me, and they delayed conversation about software, I took floppy disks and started going through... ZX FORMAT 3,4,4.5,5,6 - faces. Faultles persons. the turn persons fiveteens persons. magic stripes faces. spectrofon(s) persons. everything was purchased from Logros/donated by the authors. I don’t have any other similar programs no (copyright), there were several here under cpm disks (purchased from Vicks) and then took them from friend of persons since the first ones were also buggy. although is-dos copied... well and ufo too... I think one disc of 10 is not very scary, although for I’m _ashamed_ because I myself I'm trying to do it and imagining how it would be it’s difficult when one program takes half a year VL> In order not to bore readers with a fruitless discussion about the presence of breakers VL> passwords in five minutes, let's conduct an experiment. I give it to you VL> password-protected app and these five minutes. If you don't reveal it, no one will hold your tongue VL> pulled. I can’t reveal anything, there’s nowhere... In general, the conversation reached a dead end, but Oldman's letter seemed to me that they This password was simply guessed in 30 minutes. quote: "you would have put ... last" seems like it, so let's close the topic we won't get anywhere anyway. ▌▌║▌█▐│▌▌▐▐ WiTh The BeST wIsheS fROM ▌▌║▌█▐│▌▌▐▐ *C*R*E*A*T*O*R* ▌812/03.00▐ -+- zxasm+ positive

From Michael Kondratyev To Paul Falcon 13 November 1997

Hello Paul! Sat Sep 27 1997, Paul Falcon concocted a letter to Vladimir Larkov: PF>> ... and who threw it the first time? isn't it you? VL>> Ya. Only in password-protected archives. PF> unarj like the program is called , for PF> an hour on any stump will try all the passwords, so PF> which is not scary... archive pap 2.0, password >10chars - you’ll be sorting through something like this for a couple of years. With best wishes, Michael.

From Roman Alexandrov To Vladimir Larkov 15 March 1998

Hello, Vladimir! September 27, 1997, 04:08, Vladimir Larkov wrote to Paul Falcon on the topic "Spectrum or PC.": PF>>>> threw it into the Spectrofon 22,23 file, VL>>> Dima Grigoriev aka Oldman? He is more of a pisishnik than an Amigaist. PF>> ... and who threw it the first time? isn't it you? VL> Ya. Only in password-protected archives. [skipped] VL> A password-protected archive is a thing that cannot be accessed without a password VL> is unpacked. I already wrote about this in zx - I probably really VL> you should have put naked women in these archives, then it would really exist VL> best provocation of the year. Honestly speaking, I still don’t understand why you did this? [skipped] Happy connections. Roman. March 15, 1998, already 11:36