rules of CODE.ZX

ZXNet echo conference «code.zx»

From Moderator To All 1 February 1999

Hi, All! > CODE.ZX echo conference rules > Revision dated January 31, 1999. > 1. Moderation. 1.1 The moderator of this conference is Grigoriev Oleg Bo- risovich. FidoNet: 2:5030/675.11 ZXNet: 500:812/5.2 500:812/10.13 E-mail: Oleg_Grigoriev.sp0502@zxnet.spb.ru 1.2 The moderator of this conference is Dmitry Lomov Yuryevich. ZXNet: 500:812/8.14 E-mail: Dmitry_Lomov.sp0814@zxnet.spb.ru > 2. Subject. 2.1 Programming in any language (even BASIC is up to you) She), and, accordingly, the exchange of information and experience in this no area, any questions and answers. 2.2 Everything related to the ZX-Spectrum software portable computers. 2.3 Transfer of data, know-how in programming, algorithms with other platforms to the ZX-Spectrum platform. 2.4 Discussion of other platforms, to a limited extent. > 3. Information exchange form. 3.1 The language of the conference is Russian. Other languages please apply Use only when necessary. 3.2 Program listings - only in text form, any other Dictions in echo are not allowed. Listings in non-standard encoding are allowed only in filehack or UUE.3.3 Information, programs, files. There is a file called CODE.ZX.FILES. If it is not available to you, then you can use UUE. Without moderator permissions, you can send no more than 16 kilobytes to day. The size is determined by the source file. Recommended programs sulks accompanied by a comment. > 4. Violations. 4.1 [+] Obscene expressions and expressions that can be interpreted forge as such. Mat in the conference is strictly prohibited - both in Russian and in English. Replacement with $%&#@ symbols is possible it is possible, but you should not abuse it; with a high degree of probability The moderator will not like this, because he is the only one in this case tea defines the boundaries of decency. 4.2 [+] Expressions that can be interpreted as personal insult affection to anyone; this means not only open pu- gan, but also insults based on nationality, religion or any other any other sign. 4.3 [+] Initiating and maintaining various squabbles and altercations rib. 4.4 [+] Message not on the topic of the conference (offtopic). 4.5 [*] Disrespectful statements about Speccy and its creation giver. 4.6 [+] Propaganda or insult to a particular way of writing writing programs in rough form; assessment of this or that is allowed method by type: ...that's good. ...but this is bad because... All arguments must be substantiated.4.7 [+] Unfounded, impartial assessment of someone as programmer 4.8 [+] Unauthorized moderation. 4.9 [+] Discussion of the actions of the moderator and comoderators, disputes with them in the conference. 4.10 [*] Overquoting (more than 60% of quotes). 4.11 [*] Personal correspondence in the echo area. 4.12 [+] Intentional placement in (ph)echo of distorted or distorted home of false information. 4.13 [!] Deliberate placement in the (f)echo of destructive pro- frame support. 4.14 [*] Discussion of methods for breaking the security of a program. 4.15 [*] Comparison of computers of different designs or designs architectures by type: X-SUXX, Y-RULEZ. 4.16 [*] Meaningless message. 4.17 [*] Use of foreign languages where you can easily use Russian. > 5. Punishments. 5.1 Minor violations are punishable by a warning [*], more serious ones - a remark [+], very serious ones are punished shutdown [!]. 5.2 [*][*][*][*][*][*] = [+][+] = [!] 5.3 The moderator is in charge of recording penalties. If the same thing violation is punished simultaneously by the moderator and the co-moderator - the more strict is taken into account. 5.4 The moderator, like the co-moderator, is always right. Well, let's just say almost always. The latter does not detract from his right to punish. If not If you agree, please contact me via netmail. It was noticed that the moderator was sufficientdefinitely too lazy to star anyone. So screams like "Prokhorov sax!" will not be punished in reasonable quantities ;) 5.5 The moderator has bouts of bad mood. I advise You should not fall under the “hot hand”. ;) > 6. List of obvious offtopic topics. 6.1 Re-election of a moderator or co-moderators. 6.2 Still, in order not to clog up the airwaves, stick to the topic of con- preferences, gentlemen. This is the main wish. > 7. Technical requirements. Letters sent to this conference must: 7.1 Meet the requirements for registration echo messages in ZXNet. 7.2 Do not contain tampered elements of the template, type line and origin (except for those cases when it is necessary for meaning of the message). 7.3 Have a greeting no longer than 3 standard 80 characters No lines and signature are no longer than 2. 7.4 It is not recommended to send messages of size more than 15 kilobytes. > 8. Miscellaneous. 8.1 Declaring any topic off-topic is solely the prerogative of the moderator. 8.2 The moderator believes that the fact of writing a letter to this con- conference means that the author is familiar with and agrees with the rules of the con- ferences. > 9. Amendments and additions to these rules. 9.1 Changes and additions are made to the rules only by moderators rom on the basis of its own decision, or at the request of the participant cov conference; At the same time, he intends to maintain the general direction importance of this conference. 9.2 Proposals for changes to the rules can be sent by derator/comoderator ONLY by netmail. > 10. Stylistics, spelling and punctuation. 10.1 This is just a wish - respect the rights of other participants kov conference in terms of the readability of your messages, this is often directly related to the literacy of their writing; known to be bad the example is contagious, including in this area. If you don't you know how to spell this or that word, replace it with a synonym, Don’t torment our eyes with words like “I sang” or “it’s being done.” Respect our great and mighty!.. 10.2 Coolhacker messages of the form "(00│ ├┤А(К3Я") are equal to a message in a foreign language. 10.3 Although errors and typos are not a punishable offence, they are but deliberate disregard for spelling as such (e.g. total absence of capital letters and punctuation) may be considered a violation, and is equivalent to a message on a foreign early language. :) Moderator.