CP/M 3.0 for commodore64

Greetings, All! Can someone explain to me why the subject is worse or better than CP/M 2.2 of 1980 release by Digital Research or subject 2.6 for PROFI? Which version of CP/M is the most advanced of all existing ones? What is Z-System? With best wishes, Kirill Frolov.

┌───────────────────────────────── ─────────────────────────────────── ─ │ * Forwarded by Vladimir Larkov (2:5030/675) * ├──────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────── ─ │ * Area : PVT.C64 (FidoNet: PVT.C64) │ * From : Peter Sobolev, 2:5030/84 (Mon 18-Jan-99 04:14) │ * To : Vladimir Larkov │ * Subj : CP/M 3.0 for commodore64 └────────────────────────────── ─────────────────────────────── ─ Hello Vladimir! 17 Jan 99 07:26, Vladimir Larkov wrote to All: VL> Can someone explain to me why the subject is worse or better than CP/M 2.2 of 1980 VL> release by Digital Research or subject 2.6 for PROFI ? it's not 3.0 but 3.0 plus. I have already forgotten almost everything, but I remember that it is much better. Starting from the utilities supplied with it and ending with all sorts of little things in the interface with the user (if you can call it an interface ;) In addition, it is written exclusively for z80, and 2.2 as far as I remember for 8080. Applications from 2 2 went great for me (in particular assembler: turbopascal 2 0, wordstar, dbase, etc.) Then, it has some kind of support for multiprocessing (in the C128 there are three processor, two of them can work together in CP/M mode - 8502 and Z80). Also, output can be carried out in parallel on two monitors - 80 and 40 columns (the image will of course be different). VL> Which version of CP/M is the most advanced of all existing ones? I have never seen or heard anything higher than this VL> What is Z-System? I don't know CodeRipper ─── DiskEdit 7.02 under OS/2 v2.2 # Origin: -= iNFUSED BYTES OnLine: http://www.enlight.ru/ib =- (2:5030/84) ─ ───────────────────┤ * end of forwarded msg * ├─────────────────── ─ Hello, Kirill! With best wishes, Vladimir.