From
Grigoriev Valery
→
To
All
28 October 2005
Hello, All
Has anyone done this?
I mean getting the two Spectrums to work together.
Here the question flew through the FIDO echo: is it necessary to use an echo tag? I'm there
I tried to push to develop the topic, but for some reason the forum complained about the lack
right but that's not the question.
The question is this - all Spectrums have almost no use (at the moment)
tape recorder port - EAR and SPK bits - for input and output. Purely technically it is possible
at a sufficiently high speed [for standard ports the speed is known, for
tape recorder, of course, it needs to be selected, but it is quite obvious that it will be
not low speed, it is quite possible that up to several kilobytes per second,
true when both connected stations are fully loaded] connect via these ports
(and besides them, there are many specks with parallel and serial ports)
two spectra (you can make more, but the implementation is labor-intensive
- there is a need for a transaction controller - a separate computing
system) - and since their performance is basically the same, then
By using a bunch of Spectrums you can double your productivity almost for free.
Actually, the freebie is this: let it have 1 spetrum more or less
advanced (say, HDD, FDD, AY 256K, etc.) and there is a fairly old one, but
functional ZX-48K. And even if it is not there, it is certainly possible either aspick up a gift from someone you know, old but still fully functional
ZX-48K (even 16K is enough there in a pinch; even if that’s not there, give it
purchase announcement there will be people interested immediately).
Then, by connecting one of the ports (tape recorder,
parallel/serial) such a “small” Spectrum, you can figure it out
two-in-one performance.
Why might such performance be needed?
For example, to make music on one (full calculation for digital music
say) while another computer draws graphics.
Or parallelize mathematical calculations (compute complex calculations for
3D demos for example).
Well, etc.
In the sense that there is something to connect the Spectrums for, it will be found. But practically
Has anyone tried to do this?
P.S. does not mean that both Spectrums work with the same memory with one
screen, etc. This refers to two discrete spectra that operate in
cluster, performing the same task in conjunction.
From
jtn
→
To
All
28 October 2005
Hello,GriV
Gri> let it have 1 more or less advanced space (say, HDD, FDD, AY
Gri> 256K, etc.) and there is a fairly old but functional ZX-48K.
that's exactly what happened. on the first one the program was loaded, magic was pressed and a snapshot
was transferred to the second. Well, we also played online games
From
Yuri Potapov
→
To
All
28 October 2005
Hello,GriV
At what speed do you plan to transmit? still not RS 232
From
Grigoriev Valery
→
To
All
28 October 2005
Hello jtn
jtn> that's exactly what happened. on the first one the program was loaded, magic was compressed and
jtn> was transferred as a snapshot to the second one. well, we also played online games
Gah, great, where was that??? And what does magic have to do with it? meaning
interaction according to the client-server model, and here the division is into
program level, the same thing you write about is somewhat different.
From
ASDT
→
To
All
28 October 2005
Hello,GriV
"make two Spectrum work together"
Why? What could be the task for such a bundle?
From
Chunin Roman
→
To
All
28 October 2005
Hello,GriV
KAI can be connected via LPT!
From
Alexander Zan
→
To
All
29 October 2005
Hello, CHRV
Everything described above is reminiscent of a combination of spec and GS ;) (who would give me a legible
photo of GS on both sides). All that remains is to stick to the second SounDrive spec and
overclock it a little, and you've got almost GS :D And regular Covox (preferably stereo)
it wouldn't look bad anymore :v2_clapp:
For complete happiness, all that remains is to correct the ROM so that it automatically
accept and run the necessary initial data. And provide for the possibility
turning it off so that all memory can be used.
In general, the idea is interesting (especially in light of the high cost of new hardware): v2_cheer:
But it’s better not to use the gramophone port :v2_scare:
From
Grigoriev Valery
→
To
All
29 October 2005
Hello ASDT
ASD> "make two Spectrums work together"
ASD> Why? What could be the task for such a combination?
Please read more carefully, everything is written above...
From
Kirill Frolov
→
To
Chunin Roman
29 October 2005
Press RESET immediately, Chunin Roman!
On Fri, 28 Oct 05 21:53:57 +0400, Chunin Roman wrote:
CR> KAI can be connected via LPT!
Scorpion tozhe mozhno.
Tol'ko skorpion prakticheski uzhe imeet programmnyjj RS232.
From
Krasheninnikov Alexander
→
To
All
29 October 2005
Hello,GriV
Gri> resulting in 2 kbytes per second peak capacity
Gri> The question remains: has anyone connected 2 Spectrums in this form?
This is how I connected 2 Spectrums. I remade the LastBattle game (I can’t post it because...
Everything is on floppy disks somewhere, I can hardly find it... damn it). For communication purposes only
non-tape ports were used because there are all sorts of chains at the entrance,
cutoff frequencies above 5 kHz approximately. The Kempston port of the joystick was used
(bit 0 - for input ess) and printer port (also 0 bit for transmission, port number
not standard). A speed of about 4 kb/sec was achieved. The transfer was carried out
blocks of 256 bytes with checksums with retransmission in case
errors (there were versions that reduced the transmission speed in case of repeated errors).
It worked very cool, the only thing missing was the protective timers - if
the connection breaks (sometimes my wire broke - there was a connection in the middle of the wire
Jack 3.5 connectors) somewhere in the middle of a byte transfer, everything freezes.
Operating principle: The parties initially know who is the receiver and who is the transmitter on
soon. The receiver waits for the start bit from the transmitter. Having received it
begins to form the chain 01010101010 at its output. At every shift
level, the transmitter sets the next bit of data at its output, and the receiver
reads it.Because on the second computer there was no disc grinder as an initial boot
a feature was used: the input wire was also connected to the tape input.
First, the small loader was loaded using the standard method (on the transmitting side
there was a copy of procedure 1218 with a changed port). Then this bootloader was already used
the described protocol and loaded the main code of the last battle.
P.S. I found some receiver/transmitter sources that seem to be right there
used. See attachment (CP866)
File: NetwTXT.txt http://zx.pk.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=1862
From
Krasheninnikov Alexander
→
To
All
29 October 2005
Hello,GriV
Gri> parallelize mathematical calculations (compute complex calculations
Gri> for 3D demos, for example).
Gri>
I think this is only feasible for parallel ports or when using
hardware receivers/transmitters. And here's why:
Transmission/reception takes up the processor completely and for a long time (I think 1.5 seconds
pausing to transmit one screen is not acceptable in a demo/screen). Although
maybe there will be craftsmen...
From
Grigoriev Valery
→
To
All
31 October 2005
Hello Alex Crush
Ale> I think this is only feasible for parallel ports or for
Ale> using hardware receivers/transmitters. And here's why:
Ale> Transmission/reception takes up the entire processor and for a long time (I think 1.5
Ale> a second pause to transfer one screen is unacceptable in
Ale> demo/screen). Although there may be craftsmen...
I agree, it’s true that they already grilled that two Speck were connected at a speed of 112
kbit, this is of course very cool. But that’s not the point, it’s that this option
clustering was not used at all.
If we initially take the diagram of a standard Speck, and almost all of them were with
Kempston ports, then in the case of complete delegation of functions you can use
second (weaker) spectrum as a functional appendage (initially rejecting
his active participation in the process - information is simply transferred to him, and he
it turns and turns as it should).
5 bits of information are immediately issued to the Kempston port (it’s not entirely clear here, maybe
be there we actually use 8 signal lines, however the classic
The joystick is adjusted only 5), plus 1 bit along the tape recorder line. Here
there are a lot of options, but the speed will be significantly increased compared to
the option that I suggested above.About the program that loaded the second computer. Honestly, no way
I didn’t think of that, it’s a very good option. I still assumed or sew in
ROM control code or use a tape recorder for basic loading.
From
Grigoriev Valery
→
To
All
31 October 2005
Hello,GriV
Gri> I agree, here it’s true that they already grilled that two specks were connected to
Gri> with a speed of 112 kbit, this is of course very cool. But that’s not the point, it’s
Gri> that this clustering option was not used at all.
Gri> If we initially take the scheme of a standard speck, and almost all of them were
Gri> with Kempston ports, then in the case of complete delegation of functions it is possible
Gri> use the second (weaker) Spectrum as a functional one
Gri> appendage (initially rejecting his active participation in the process - on
Gri> information is simply transmitted to him, and he twists it and turns it as he does
Gri> necessary).
Gri> 5 bits of information are immediately issued to the Kempston port (not quite here
Gri> clearly, maybe there are actually 8 signal lines used there
Gri> however, with a classic joystick, only 5) plus 1 bit are adjusted
Gri> along the tape recorder line. There are a lot of options here, but speed
Gri> will be increased several times, compared to the version I have
Gri> suggested above.
Gri> Gri> About the program that loaded the second computer. Honestly, no way
Gri> whatever you guessed, it’s a very good option. I still
Gri> assumed either to flash the control code into ROM or use
Gri> tape recorder for basic loading.
It's not good to quote yourself, but still...
You can use keyboard ports as a transmission channel, there are a lot of them there
just...
From
Kirill Frolov
→
To
Grigoriev Valery
2 November 2005
Press RESET immediately, Valery Grigoriev!
On Mon, 31 Oct 05 17:35:56 +0300, Grigoriev Valery wrote:
GV> It’s not good to quote yourself, but still...
GV> You can use keyboard ports as a transmission channel, they are there
GV> a lot of simple...
Can be connected via ZX-BUS. The Z80 can deliver a tire on demand.
You can build a circuit to capture the bus of one computer with a processor
another. And use someone else's memory. Ehto simply (if only
synchronize the clock frequency). Well, the wires, of course, are not
30 centimeters long.
From
Boris Krasnoperov
→
To
All
2 November 2005
Hello,GriV
Gri> It’s not good to quote yourself, but still...
Gri> You can use keyboard ports as a transmission channel, their
Gri> there’s just a lot...
The most correct approach is to solder the RS232 controller by Kamil Karimov
There's even a 126-byte buffer.
From
Grigoriev Valery
→
To
All
3 November 2005
Hello, All
Kir> Press RESET immediately, Grigoriev Valery!
Kir>
Kir> On Mon, 31 Oct 05 17:35:56 +0300, Grigoriev Valery wrote:
Kir>
Kir>
Kir> Can be connected via ZX-BUS. The Z80 can provide a tire upon request.
Kir> You can build a circuit to capture the bus of one computer with a processor
Kir> another. And use someone else's memory. Ehto simply (if only
Kir> synchronize clock frequency). Well, the wires, of course, are not
Kir> 30 centimeters long.
No, this method won’t work, although it’s certainly an option ;)))
I offered non-separable and unconnected Spectrums, which only through external
ports collide with each other
Regarding 115200 and 38400, I’ll say for sure that this will certainly work, but how
You yourself correctly noted, work to the limit - error correction and so on
It’s not done on the fly, and it’s quite difficult to link two Spectrums
- the lack of buffers, etc. affects
Although, of course, I found something new in these algorithms - a way to synchronize
for example - along the front.
From
Krasheninnikov Alexander
→
To
All
10 November 2005
Hello,GriV
I think that in the end the issue comes down to speed vs simplicity
communication devices :-). If you need high speed and low usage
processor - you can also make a DMA controller with a normal
RS-232 receiver-transmitter. But it's difficult. In my opinion it is too difficult.
The simplest communication method is already built-in - just connect
Criss-cross tape connectors of two specs. But it's slow. Too much.
The optimal solution is somewhere in the middle.
In my opinion, a good method is a shift register, which would convert
sent byte into a sequence of bits (and vice versa when receiving). This
would reduce the loading of the speck. A sort of LPT->RS232 converter. After all, according to LPT
connecting computers is a perversion... what if they are in different rooms? how many wires are there?
will need...
There were once ideas to make a similar device with a buffer on a microcontroller.
I just wanted to connect speccy <-> PC to organize the storage of a large number of
screw type data. But this idea suffered the same fate as many others - it remained
just an idea.
Gri> Although, of course, I found something new in these algorithms - a way
Gri> synchronization for example - along the front.
So I also have synchronization on the front :-) and at the same time on the decline too