From
Wladimir Bulchukey
→
To
Alexander Bondarenko
16 December 2002
*** Reply to a message from ZXNET.FISHING (Fish day in Yekaterinburg).
Excuse me... That is, sorry already, Alexander...!
15 Dec 02 13:27, Alexander Bondarenko -> All:
AB> Newspaper "FISHERMAN OF FISHERMAN"
Well, finally the name... I can still understand "Fisherman Fisherwoman", but this...!
;-))
(Wlodek came and vulgarized everything...).
With the best - Wlodek. * [] * mailto: wlblack(at)newmail.ru
http://wlodeks.boom.ru * <[ZX]> * http://wlodek.newmail.ru
[500:95/462@ZXNet] [2:5016 Forever] [Golyanovo] [Radio 'Retro' 88.3 MHz]
From
Alexander Bondarenko
→
To
Wladimir Bulchukey
19 December 2002
*Hello, Wlodek!*
Catch my ideas about the subject “Fish”, which I talked about on December 16, 2002
your footcloth to comrade. Alexander Bondarenko.
AB>> Newspaper "FISHERMAN FISHERMAN"
WB> Well, finally the name... I can still understand "Fisherman Fisherwoman", but this...!
WB> ;-))
There are also magazines like this: “An angler is an athlete.” "Fishing with us."
;))))))))
And finally they say this: e%ak e%aka e%et from afar with a spinning rod.
;)
/That’s all, Wlodek, you can scroll further.../
From
Nik Aleksandrovich
→
To
Wladimir Bulchukey
13 February 2003
And how is your niche, Wladimir!
I am writing to you from a burning tank...
Mon 16 Dec 2002 21:34:17, Wladimir Bulchukey -> Alexander Bondarenko:
AB>> Newspaper "FISHERMAN FISHERMAN"
WB> Well, finally the name... I can still understand "Fisherman Fisherwoman", but
WB> this...!
WB> ;-))
On the program "WINDOWS" and they will be at the helm...
;)
Best regards, Niko Sun ATM-turbo rulezzz!!!
mail: sprut@newmail.ru Si yo leter, Wladimir ...
From
Alexander Bondarenko
→
To
Nik Aleksandrovich
22 February 2003
*Hello, Nik!*
Catch my ideas about the subject “Fish”, which I talked about on 13 Feb 2003
your footcloth to comrade. Wladimir Bulchukey.
AB>>> Newspaper "FISHERMAN OF FISHERMAN"
WB>> Well, finally the name... I can still understand “Fisherman Fisherwoman”, but
WB>> this is...!
WB>> ;-))
NA> On the program "WINDOWS" and they will be at the helm...
NA> ;)
In general, these "WINDOWS" are designed for fools.
A normal person will only watch them because of the terrible drinking/smoking - pure
burn over the niggles.
Well, if he brought himself to such a state, then he is already an abnormal person,
so the conclusions are obvious. ;)
/That’s all, Nik, you can scroll further.../
From
Nik Aleksandrovich
→
To
Alexander Bondarenko
1 March 2003
And how is your nothing, Alexander!
I am writing to you from a burning tank...
Tue 22 } 2003 22:49:00, Alexander Bondarenko -> Nik Aleksandrovich:
NA>> On the program "WINDOWS" and they will be at the helm...
NA>> ;)
AB> In general, these "WINDOWS" are designed for fools.
wide range :)
AB> A normal person is their only because of the terrible drunkenness/fucking
AB> will watch - purely to burn over the assholes.
AB> Well, if he brought himself to such a state, then he already
AB> is an abnormal person, so the conclusions are obvious. ;)
Your logic is obvious - you don’t like scandalous shows solo... Yes, of course
normal person won’t go there, solve family, intimate and other problems
so it's kind of... reckless, but that's the beauty of it
program, it can be called instructive, to see people’s problems, although interesting
It doesn't happen to everyone...
Best regards, Niko Sun ATM-turbo rulezzz!!!
mail: sprut@newmail.ru Si yo leter, Alexander ...
From
Alexander Bondarenko
→
To
Nik Aleksandrovich
13 March 2003
*Hello, Nik!*
Catch my ideas about the subject “Fish”, which I talked about on March 01, 2003
your footcloth to comrade. Alexander Bondarenko.
NA>>> On the program “WINDOWS” and they will be at the helm...
NA>>> ;)
AB>> In general, these "WINDOWS" are designed for fools.
NA> wide circle :)
Yes, it got divorced, it got divorced, I still agree with you.
AB>> A normal person is their only because of the terrible drunkenness/fucking
AB>> it will be worth watching - just to enjoy the jokes.
AB>> Well, if he brought himself to such a state, then he already
AB>> is an abnormal person, so the conclusions are obvious. ;)
NA> Your logic is obvious - you don’t like scandalous shows solo...
We're bored. Previously, maybe it was a wonder when they first appeared. And now
what not. But "WINDOWS" are in the lead. ;)
NA> Yes
NA> of course a normal person. will not go there, family, intimate, etc.
NA> solving problems this way is somehow... reckless, but that’s the point
NA> and all the beauty of this program, it can be called instructive, see
NA> people's problems, although not everyone is interested....Usually people watch it to get burned. And those situations that are in it are not from
lives are taken (such information was leaked in the press, and even so it’s all noticeable), and
washed by the scriptwriters and played out by the actors. So what about
instructiveness... Well, it is there, it is. But not at all the same. :)
/That’s all, Nik, you can scroll further.../