Opinion. Thoughts on the System Software.
Nuts
I have, that is Nuts'a again verbal diarrhea. Rove all
thoughts. Thoughts on account of any rulezu and software.
All here thoughts on the competition for the best software.
And it turns out that the idea is not so good as it seems.
After all, if you figure out just the best software is not
always mean that it is the favorite, comfortable and most
commonly used. Thoughts such went when compared commanders. Here
because there are plenty of very cool and clever kommandeov it
even if you do not believe that some are buggy or have theirs
only a demo. Even if we take otnositelno standard or with a
couple of extra chips, then, in my vzgdyad, people do not enjoy
the steepest, and then choose how to imagine, for whatever
their inner feelings and personal
requirements. In a word - the taste and
color ...
I have long compared the Commander used my friends and
acquaintances. As it turned out, people prefer to mostly
the same style: the good old
Conver, with fine print. I do not know
Is the font, design, hard to say. But the lead was good old
Jemmini, Conver, Real and Global. And the transition
even with Global mnogoglyuchnogo at Real 1.8
is practically impossible.
Affect existing stereotypes. Even
Similar in design and OMEGA HONEY not take root. But nothing of
TOTAL, Turbo, Gun, with their unusual design ... Nevertheless,
Cmdr all kodyat and kodyat: all sorts, different.
Again, all the same, and with graphics and
sprite editors. Ponadelano their
any weight. Forget also for a moment that
a lot of them work in his undocumented format, and not always
even allows you to cut the schedule from the standard screen!
Important that many have quite remarkable features. But
hudozhnichki something we always put the blame on
inoplatformennye editors - basic
arguments are the windows of arbitrary shape, lots of colors
and filters that allow artists, especially not to waste time.
Joke is that the more loaded the good old ART STUDIO and the
pictures painted there. Here talents are manifested only as
coloring.
Actually, if the only important result, it is possible and
so, as if the artist PCs do not? Or is there a danger that
artist, and after watching trukolora hayreza perish forever
with spectrum? Or before that he did not see the components and
Someone told him that "HRC - RULEZ: (
Here is where the need SPEKovsky editor, adapted to the needs
of the artist.
Here, for example, DIVER This process rides, well written -
that he needed to photo editor, brought a lot of original ideas
and ...
In short, users are recommended software often kicking
softoproizvoditeley (mind you, not me:) c requirements of
concrete improvements in the software. And then we have Many
authors, having zyvyshennoy whether modesty, or coolness, and
write sistemki, igruhi, newspapers and magazines purely
for myself, not humiliated before contact with the stupid user.
Polohim consequence of this is the complete absence HELP,
documentation and setup in the produced programs.
The positive side of the undocumented is the sharp increase
hacker-modifikatorskoy activities.
At least people are working, and then write something yourself.
Are better. Q: Does the anger just bend the author on such
crackers, if this prog with all possible, documentation is only
the inscription that the program is distributed freely,
provided non-payment change?
In other programs, described in detail
format everyone there overlays, so what? This program also did
not want to use it - still, inconvenient.
The result is a lot of unnecessary work: people write and
break, break and write, break and write, but no good there.
There is no perfect program.
A must: the service and setup, detailed
management and documentation. It would be nice
porasprashivat around and around saying what they need in this
prog, and whether it ought markups. And rasprashivat to an
addiction - which can be interesting in mind. This will not
create sverhnavorochennye and no unnecessary complexes not
finish until the end and scary glyuchaschie, not compact, but
very convenient and useful files of. It should be just a little
bit to try to ease No programming is turned inconvenience in
use.
It was after this work badsome
You can organize competitions for the best
software - unless a new, worthy of such consideration. Moreover,
in the evaluation and the new and old software is good to
further divide the detail say, choose not the best sistemku and
the best editor, viewer, assembler, debugger, Cmdr. But now
representatives of some of the nominations quite a few others -
a little, and have to choose only some of them, while others
leave unaddressed because of lack competition.
CALL CODER!
Come to Him!
Make it a scruff!
And tell me what do you want!
*
