T E M A I I I
(C) UNCLE SAM
Particular issues
in the public sphere.
Hello dear readers and listateli our newspaper. I was silent
because I waited ordered KAY, but now Tear in full on your eye,
wrote a great little article about that, about this.
I'll start, perhaps, with the features of the national
self-esteem and my first victim will Unbeliever. I'm surprised
and amazed! As it so happened! The man traveled
but only one party is taken to comment, several Born Dead
the other party! Gentlemen, this is just nonsense and TRIP! To
me it looks like the description of one picture to another
blind man blind man so even with the words treego blind. And not
particularly in expressions of shame that is showing elementary
disrespect for other people. Unfortunately, the tendency to be
holier than the Pope has been steadily expanding. It is clear
that youthful ambitions and the rod of "Very advanced" young
people, but may be better diminished accusatory zeal or, better
yet, send all their energy to do useful all spektrumistam. A
critique actually very easy. I could understand Unbeliever'a,
if he personally held several parties and would take on
courage then anyone criticize.
But this is no way I think and will not be
Samara. In general, released a Unbeliever
highly biased information. Hmmm, ugly all of it. And closing
this topic, I want to advise editors to precede any
information from reporters or from myself
a footnote that "the information received is a subjective point
of view and is not the ultimate truth." By I think it will be
correct and proper for with respect to the reader. And it is
really after. Unbeliever complained that the party allegedly
divorced without any measure and better to hold one (grand -
the semi-official). So Now, my point of view diametrically
opposed. All sorts of festivals, exhibitions, congresses,
gatherings and party should be as much as possible. For only in
a variety of forms there is a grain of life. And after some
time of all this diversity remain only viable forms of meetings
spektrumistov.
The second victim of my infamous pen will be a group of
Eternity Industry and events DiHalt'99. Let's start with the
hackneyed truth "miser pays twice." EI ignored her and got the
pill. Believe me, I and he is not thrilled with the quality of
this party, but what is happening there is not EI
defies logic. From the outset,
EI took up watermelon and started shitting not
only for themselves but also shove scraps
a place of neighbors, thereby demonstrating
their level of culture and showing disrespect to all the
neighbors and the organizers this party. Again, for voting to
forms were to fly, but EI is not considered
necessary to buy them, hoping to vote in
freebies. But voices EI with friendly voices of groups to
ensure their superiority in every position. Could ... At the
same time a very bad impression was when
someone BeerManz became rock right in front of
Commission and put her ultimatums. Very
unsightly spectacle was. To me, if the
something does not agree, then come out ahead, the people rise
up and tell the person the problem with what and what you do
not agree, and tell their own ways of solving problems. A
throat nadsazhdat - What this happiness? Perhaps there'll pass
on the same organizers DiHalt'99. Gentlemen, I have heard all
results annulled and there will be some votes in some
networks? Then I wonder what I was paying, voting for the first
time and who will return to me my money? In general, went to
some kind of rat fuss around the results. This is it's sad.
Boys their own hands dug the grave themselves as I have no doubt
that no one else will go precisely to
DiHalt due to excessive flexibility of its organizers. And for
the future - it would be nice to get together more former
organizers of such parties and, identifying problems, find ways
to solve them, ie make the best plan for the best realization
of pati and run it in free flight in the country. I think it's
very helpful to beginners and organizers would not allow them
to rush from side to side like hares in the open field.
My third will be the victim of rabid
lovers find fault another's property. Listen
you, what do you care that someone is out of computers. If you
have something that do you think is an accomplishment, then
why did you start imposing, and often
and aggressively to impose its point of view
others. Of course, there are computers constructively made
worse than others, but why everything has to be to interfere
with the dirt. Do not forget that we live so far in the country
of limited opportunities and the only reason any workable thing
in demand. I, personally, would like something the whole
country moved to KAY, but I'm not over-emphasize this
issue at every opportunity because
I know so many people have no money to
purchase KAY'ya. People buy what is
available and had enough money. Unfortunately, in Russia,
economic instability completely kills the mechanism of buying
on credit. But such a mechanism would be very useful to the
public. Then I would gladly have bought in installments any PC
for the home. You can still argue long on this theme, but will
sense I do not know. Finally will only oriental wisdom retold
by my words: Do not constrict their horizons, locking eyes only
one subject, one must look at the world as a whole and then the
eyes and mind open, and visible and what was previously hidden
from our senses. So do not throw yourself at eye blinders and
do not let others do it. Of course, everyone should have his
own point view, because viewpoint of the individual -
is the imposition of aggregate Thinking
processes that depend on the degree of intelligence,
subjective, and (or) the objective causes of life of this
individual.
Next on the list will talk about the gravedigger Spectrum.
Spectrum is really slowly rots, and it's true. Primarily, this
is due to human passivity, ie, devil-may-care attitude
to the Spectrum. Few number of people actually doing something
useful, not stands on the site. The basic part of a herd of
cows, chewing gum and old want any change. And it is scary.
Following this lowers the bar for quality
programs and reduced interest in Spectrum.
People start to claim the money that categorically Spectrum
contraindicated. For where the money is there, there are dying
human relationships. One consolation is only one circumstance -
the Spectrum and money are not compatible Another aspect of the
topic, which I alarming. This idea is endemic modemizatsii.
Understand, once the full Spectrum connection to any network -
this will be the day of death Spectrum. An illustrative
example? Please! Of Moscow and St. Petersburg know? So, now
there is a network available, but where is the Spectrum? A
Spectrum of These cities fins glued. Believe me, I do not
fuddy-duddy, but never the commutation process
machine cycles, program does not replace the ordinary human
communication. An example may be a so-called "virtual
sex. "This virtual sex is ersatz ersatz forever and will
remain, and one who loves like ersatz is not mentally healthy.
In my opinion, much nicer to lie with the living, normal
partner or partner (as anyone like) and no one to convince me
otherwise. In my opinion, a wholesale modemizatsiyu is
comparable to virtual sex. Of course, have a telephone and a
modem is very convenient, but it's a double edged sword and use
these must be carefully in order not to destroy it
little that we have. I would be only too glad
if someone will respond and send us
Received his views on this issue.
I would like, once this thing, and even ride
the so-called "debriefing". Ie
try to address some nuances in the
such concepts as "criticism" and "kritikanstvo. To begin with,
there are allegedly "principled" editors and authors of various
articles on the subject. And now these same "Principled"
editors and authors of every all the forces of thunder
"inessential" editors and authors. I would like to ask such a
very "principled" friends (Or master?) - And what's your
business, and who writes and reviews?? Your case raise a cry
when discovered explicit OR IMPLIED, falsification of facts,
open promotion of anything illegal and
forbidden in our country. Based on the above can be
disappointing conclusion that either many editors and
The authors do not have the depth of thinking and perception,
or they do not respect readers letting go is not present in
nature newspapers and magazines. Let me explain what I mean by
the phrase "not true". According to my point of view, reading a
newspaper or magazine has the right to receive objective
information, and he must receive. On the other hand,
Editors must first follow
the reliability of the materials supplied
authors, not missing a very subjective
presentation of someone else. Subjective information should go
a separate item and MUST be clearly stamped that it is someone
else's point of view and the reader is free to join it, or not
to join. Otherwise, such "publications" will automatically
acquire the status of the "yellow press" and "tabloid sheet,"
which means that they handicap. As I understand it, many open
their electronic publications without even thinking about the
responsibility borne by their shoulders, they just ignore it.
The result is not a newspaper or magazine, and shout for
watering the dirt of his personal opponents and even by
strangers, with their point of view. Obtained Such a picture,
the editor or author starts to work and think - this is good,
for this I praise him in his newspaper, and this
bad, I swear at him, and if they do not swear at him, then
navru with three boxes, let to disentangle. After the editor or
author of lying belly up thinking - good to have his pocket a
newspaper or magazine, very good! Now I will try to expand the
conversation. Let's talk about what I mean the expression
'inability to think deeply. " To this expression should be
added and a concept as "an inability to argue and defend
their point of view. "Unfortunately, after reading
a lot of newspapers and magazines, I found some specimens of
fairly good presentation and analysis. This is a HOBBY,
ZX-FORMAT and PCP Of course I do not really like all of these
publications, but it's not them, but in the overwhelming number
of tasteless craft projects. In these artefacts, together with
an almost professional presentation languages and programming
techniques, next undisguised kritikanstvo. So we got to the
point. For kritikanstvo a comprehensive rejection
and accusations without examining all ideas opponents, which
include allegations and reflect a purely subjective approach.
But critics - is the objective objections person who knows the
essence of the problem and include a detailed analysis of ideas
(Or thoughts), an opponent with a further elaboration of the
optimal path to a consensus. In bloat though! And by the way,
the ability to argue also part of the criticism on unsuspecting
editors and authors. Each is pouring water for their mill, and
not willing to listen to opponents. Few honors his opponents
dialogue and dispute and dispute civilized. In general,
end of the article I cite two examples.
