31.05.2000
Dear Nemo!
To a question on networks and network software. At the
moment, those who work on the Spectrum, available network
Fidonet. To work in This (and other FTN networks, for example,
local ZXNet). have the appropriate software. Situation is more
complicated with iron. For the network Fidonet need a modem
that can communicate with a modem PC. At the moment there are
two solutions to this problems. This scheme Kondratyev and
Shepeleva. But the connection of the PC modem to the computer
KAY requires self-assembly scheme that are not available to
everyone and is not supported firm (guaranteed). At the same
time, there is a workable network software under ISDOS - mailer
Dickie. Thus, if the firm would support any of the schemes
modem: a) Finally there is the application of IC
RTC DALLAS
b) A network access at Sinkleristov, as is, without doubt,
good. a) will grow and the popularity rating KAY
as machines among users. In addition to mailers,
it would not be superfluous to write a convenient editor-mail
at ISDOS (a la Lara Cnoft under TRDOS). All the necessary
descriptions I'm ready provide.
665772
26.06.2000
Dear N!
Read with interest your letter. I want to note the following:
1. Specificity of the network as an information
space. Networks are now working as
Amplifiers chimeras. The scheme is simple: there is a user A
with stupidity in the head X, and there user B with nonsense in
your head W. They are joined in a network and
vzaimoobogoschayutsya : as a result of each head -
both A and B - sits on TWO stupidity: X and Y. With the proper
chimera underneath it send some shit. There is a
commercial return. Then comes the sobering, and all begins
anew. Chimeras can be controlled. Respectively, and to ensure a
regular flow of money (a tax on stupidity). I do not see any
way sublimation / enrichment of information in networks.
They all should be taught in college, years of
five - and that is not enough. If a person does not
has a practical, PROFESSIONAL
relationship to the subject - then it
weight - as a source of information - tends to zero. Ie an
ideal noise generator. Moreover, he is not responsible for
their words. Even the right information, being placed in the
wrong for her context, it becomes noise. None
a single ideology / methodology
which would sublimate information.
Professionals is not there - some scammers (it's one of
those that work for money or for any other remuneration). I do
not see structures and methods of their construction, which
would reduce the entropy of the networks. Network degenerate.
2. The impact of networks on the platform. Network
yield increasing consumer content companies - but only in the
short term, because the essence of this increase
is resources, ie,
use of information resources without
their resume to:
a) they do not own
b) they are not satisfied (ie, in the long run contribute to
weakening of the network Spectrum'a, because in. a-. "%
metabolism - parasitism) c) they are destroyed.
Example 1. distribution of software. There are a trader, has
his work is its database (the actual software, clients,
programmers), established contacts (structure). Appear online.
As a result, volume sales are down a factor of N, where N is
the average number of users on the local grid. Trader
ruined. Ie network is filled with software
due to resources (capital) trader. But
it does not make them. Once traders
bankrupt, the network remains soft. Availability of software is
determined not only by his quantity, but also labor intensive
access. Without a database trader, in which
systematized software, we can assume that
This software is not. Thus, freebie
*.- G% -, - something I have not heard that in the
networks had their own database of appropriate power, - they
are not AS THEY MONEY COST - and the network to pay is not
accepted.
Example 2. Composition and age of owners
BBS. A friend of mine took a little research into Fido. Namely,
he decided to find educational qualification and age of the
owners of BBS, - and compared oposlya him with the situation
ten years ago. Total: The average age of owners BBS
about 1823 years old, against the 30-35 decade
ago. It is clear that on the educational
status, and even less about the professionalism
say does not make sense. Doubt that
users to represent Spectrume
greater informational value for Brugg
other than Fido (we are talking about ZXnet).
How did it happen? Meanwhile, the process
completely objective. Network of a non-profit - and this means
that the winner is the one, * b. receives more information than
it provides. Ie, roughly speaking, the more stupid exploit more
intelligent, educated and informed -
does not make up for - except that increasing noise (enropiyu)
in the information space. As a result, more intelligent
leave the network, and more stupid, by contrast, come - that
somehow - Free, of course. And a grid of
sufficiently informed, skilled and professional community has
degenerated (or at least to go) in a group of teenagers,
tormented by their own chimeras - to the reality of the
relationship does not have (it can be name and the eldest group
of kindergarten). Ideal environment for catching fish in muddy
water. Ie zadesyat years - capital network
- Namely, a skilled part of it -
was simply destroyed, drive, resursto
Not filled.
3. The prospect of networking Spectrum'e. Very
interesting question, because is the question of the
feasibility of kakihto projects in the network investment of
money and in general systematic work in this direction. 3.1.
Induced character Spectrum'ovskih networks. In fact,
nets - a reaction to the aggressive, inadequate advertising by
IBM, which is known to be proclaimed the Inet its strategic
direction. On brainwashing (Rtehnologii )
are huge amounts of money - of course, someone starts to go
crazy in the head and begins . Activity,
manifested in Spectrum'e in this direction is forced, imposed
by nature, and namely, the nature of mass / a (e. '. (This
Incidentally, the side effects of any large-scale and massive
advertising, so to speak, waste). What would happen if
I-net, together with the United States, and IBM will fly into
the tube together with its global scam? And to lighten this a
bubble? On first glance the question seems absurd.
But it is only at first glance. When
spent so much money on PR, trust
surface, a quick look dangerous.
Ordinary sense misleading, since inspired.
It is very difficult to understand for Europeans, and
Americans in particular, because individualism, they have
extraordinary. A individualism assumes full opposition
his or her identity outside world.
In this situation, see the drift, shift, Shift Self (mentality)
is practically impossible. Self-identification is seen as a
fundamental fact, as the origin, as zero coordinates, as an
axiom. In other words, people can not see its own changes, both
natural And externally imposed. Especially since such a change
can not be deployed in time to determine the directions - to
IT push. It is impossible to determine how
WAY distorting reality. And change the perception of reality is
now possible as the associative perception (Through the video
sequence, - technology and problems of this type of impact is
as old as the world and in theology is known as iconoclasm) and
diskursivnologicheskom (via text). Remains rely solely on the
cerebellum, like dolphins. About these things difficult to `aac
'$ bl, as they are on the brink and beyond language.
Usually in such a (bc f (oe I, tired of
words, I suggest that the other party (the opponent)
read POTENTIAL
DIMENSIONS OF LIES, by the example of the same Victor
Suvorov (Reference: Rezun, intelligence officer, received
British citizenship upon request and for a period of five
MINUTES. Sentenced in absentia to death). When a prisoner of
the chimeras, also created their own hands, tormented (mad)
entire nations. And this is done through insperirovaniya
reality, or in other words, the imposition of chimeras. Any
internationalist doctrine prepodnosimaya se - exhibits in
itself, if it slightly poskrebsti quite mundane and
mercantile national interests. In
30's all over the world raving communist ideas and the
Comintern. In fact, it was skillfully orchestrated a chimera.
But the Comintern held by workers and
farmers, which gnoili in the camps.
It is clear that, unlike Russia, the 30's,
America blew up its chimera for others
account. In the NASDAQ (stock index) has invested
the whole world. The actual software companies, ie share
involved, already working capital - only INTEREST from
attracted to stocks (ie debt) money. And now Bill Gates (losing
weight is about three times), promises to Enable. For people
used to the domestic terms, it would sound like this: there are
monstrous, disproportionate with what funds, and they need to
master in a literal sense, scratch - that is, perform an
economic miracle. Chimera also faced with the reality of the
world, ALWAYS falls apart. There ./`%$%+%-- k% time constants,
which, although they do not have a literal, physical sense (ie,
immeasurable SI), but nonetheless very real.
Even if you collect nine pregnant women, they do not give birth
to a baby in a month. Whatever bushunnye money they were
promised is not. If you look at the history, the three centuries
bogoostavlennosti Europe (Christianity in
Europe beyond sugar cubes - as a living religion - there is no
longer three hundred years - in Russia, by the way, too) give
much food for thought. Creation of the Cartesian myth (Kartezy
- is the name of the mathematician Rene Descartes, the Jesuits,
who had never been famous for a special depth of Christian
faith) has gone into several stages. And the fruits were
obtained after three centuries (in its entirety, as the
concepts of technical progress, Civilization, Western values).
The first the fruits appeared only in the early twentieth
century. XIX century - a century of experiments - no more.
During the late XVI and early XVII century, developed the
doctrine, ideology and produced by Esoteric (metaphorical, and
mystical), the kernel of the myth of Cartesian mathematics, as
kognetivny, cognitive device with one hand and DELICHESKY,
creating the LOGO on the other, who was able to bring forth
from her womb, a new vision of reality. In particular, only two
centuries after Descartes, Augustin Cauchy formalized the
concept of the operation limit, making it available to any
Lameroo, regardless of its moral and ethical qualities. Prior
to this notion of the limit was only available through fasting
and prayer. (For reference, the fundamental work of Descartes
<Reflections on the original philosophy of> sounds in Latin as
<Meditationes De prima philosophia>). In result, the
Charterhouse of the world was gained more than two centuries of
moral and ethical foundation - and only after This Achilles
caught a turtle (allegory Zeno of Elea) - Europe and the New
Age has gnosis (knowledge) more than there were old (the same
Archimedes). Ie Two centuries of hidden, latent development,
bearing the new reality. Communist doctrine Unborn
Almost a century before they bring their
fruit - and was Skorospelka -
quickly flourished - but quickly faded.
What's in information technology?
Mikakoy doctrine, a theory, not to mention the hermeneutic, the
esoteric nucleus. Of course, something done by Wiener,
something Prigogine. But the scriptures Prigogine for his depth
of exploration and differs little from the labor of Descartes.
Ie at the moment is no more than the bare idea. Even if it has
an ontological status (and not a chimera), it can not be
deployed overnight a new world - need an evolution - in
which is likely to leave CENTURY. Well,
Finally, mercantile, fiscal nature venture, which inspires
disgust. Americans are very fond of Freud, and not very
Young - but in vain. According to Freud the money - it's feces.
Bill Gates recalls now Mavrodi, who took so much money that
Learn them is impossible. (He wanted them to learn or not,
whether it was the original fraud or have any commercial
prospects for this, not in this case important). Many of the
agreements, conventions, statement of the platform of MS
Optionally, ie introduced purely VOLONTORISTSKI. There is no
foundation for their study. First "a% #., Necessity and
uniqueness. In Newton, the world DOES NOT EXIST arbitrary
decisions. Any unjustified outrage points to ignorance and
being implemented, leads to destruction based on its creation.
And volontaristski introduced precisely the doctrinal position,
rather than technical solutions - although, because of its
arbitrariness, and they can be placed under questioned. Where
there should be a theoretical justification alone unfounded
approval. In other words, information Technology does not
currently have no relation to science - but Positions EXACTLY
HOW SCIENCE, ie replicated lie. It reminds profonatsiyu with
the sale of condoms, branded "Checked electronics - or pun
"Scientific Communism. "Moreover, not only at the moment, but
never in the future of science in the traditional, orthodox,
literal information technology is not BE. Science can be
defined as the cognitive (knowing, Lat. Cognitio - cognition,
research) system based on well-defined principles, WHICH CAN
NOT BE MODIFIED. One such principles is the separation of the
knower (reflectors), subject and object, which is learned
through this reflection. Computer in the same applications that
are implicit in the information technology, are always included
in the "loop" self-reflection. Therefore, it may not always be
regarded as an object. One thing to glasses and quite different
glasses, dressed to the bow. About what kind of bugs you can
fuck, if prinebrech Cartesian axiomatic knowledge in science,
very good /. oa-(+ Sri Aurobindo (Ghose) - a quotation from the
book "Conversations with Pavitra" (it is the Theosophical
Society of HP Blavatsky):: They have never gone beyond the
vital plane (Which in their terminology consistent
astral plan). I also kick off
possibility of fraud (and I, for example,
in relation to information technology, would not throw away
this opportunity - (c) Nemo). But here we may have to deal with
unintentional self-deception [wilful self - direct], since on
the vital plane see what they want to see mentally. This
complicated and wonderful realm where truth and falsehood are
hopelessly confused. It all seems a logical Organized and
seductive (but ultimately illusory) form. "As an example quoted
from Wiener. Context enough volume, or simply do not understand
what they mean. Words and phrases highlighted in capital
letters I, (c) Nemo. "In India there is still a classic Type
saniyasi (Indian monahotshelnik - (C) Nemo): However, a purely
contemplative lives of these elders were not able to satisfy
India, which became the mistress of his fate
(We are talking about the period of time after the British
protectorate over the former colony after independence, 50s of
the twentieth century - (c) Nemo); in this the country still
needs so much to do to break the vicious circle of poverty,
ignorance and misery, that there can not afford the luxury to
provide capable and experienced people to deal with the
salvation of his soul. Therefore, deep religious commitment
refined old to devote himself to another world (speech
Europeanization is about - (c) Nemo - in general, and
industrialization here in g ab-.ab () transformed into a
willingness to serve the needs of society beskorytsno wherever
necessary experience and honesty, and WHERE CAN NOT BE Talk
about personal interest.
The Indians quickly found in their
writings justification for a more secular,
but so closely associated with religion
Lifestyle saniyasi (you can even specify
where found; - (c) Nemo - Buddhism, Mahayana,
Tantra, ie the top four chariots
(-Jana, in Sanskrit)). Of course, this
it was absolutely necessary. No country can make suitable USE
OF INCENTIVES AND introduced from outside Borrowing METHODS;
SOMEWHERE IN THEIR Own traditions, in its own SPIRITUAL order
should it find the moral strength for development, which is
necessary to solve new problems. " With regard to their own
traditions, they ended when Patriarch Nikon. Live
Logo has been destroyed. Peter epoch did the rest. Now into the
traditions can only be through the mat and vodka that the
public is properly and does. Dolls, a balalaika and kokoshniki
ag% b is not goes. Now about Norbert Wiener. Characterizing the
quote: "As for me, then personal interest in the development of
computers took me far beyond the beyond the circle of ideas
connected with the past, present and future machines made of
brass, copper, glass and steel. Human brain and nervous system
in some relations are also like computers. "Both quotes from
the book" I - a mathematician. "Now this man in America hidden
in a dusty chest. We analyze The first quote. After playing
with quantifiers - according to d. `, + l-.) logic - that is,
in my view, it is permissible - because wrote mathematics, - we
obtain the following statement: "Any country will do MISMATCH
use of incentives introduced from outside, and borrowed
techniques "- so Further, according to the text. Fun game in
beads, as he said Hesse. In essence, this means
that denies the international character
Western doctrines - they are absolutely universal, the
significance and applicability. This not even talking about
information technologies and their generation - RSke and
I-nete. It is possible that some APPLICATION
can take place. But clearly denied
direct cloning of foreign regulations and
their imposition. Points to the need to develop their own
technologies. And this is sedition, heresy, all-conquering
U.S. doctrine is being questioned. Bad, bad for the U.S.
citizen. More Quote: ": ambitious people belonging
insufficiently loyal to the company, or, more elegantly, not
inclined to worry because of the fact that spending someone
else's money, was once afraid of academic careers,
like the plague. And since the war (there is a
mean 1939-1945 - (c) Nemo) such
adventurers, were getting used to stockbrokers or a "% bg,
(insurance businesses flooded science. Us
had to abandon many of the old
representations. We all know that the scientists
has its drawbacks. Among us there were pedants, lovers of
alcohol, chestodyubtsy, but the normal state of things we did
not expect to find in their midst and liars mischief "This is
written about someone, not about Does Bill Gates? (Quote from
the same source: NA Wiener. "Mathematician." Publishing House
"Nauka / Home edition of Physical Mathematical Literature. M.
1967. / Translated from the American edition: New York, 1956).
You can certainly assume that all the above not more than
generalities, - just idle talk, no specifics.
In fact, it is not. When it comes to
hundreds of billions of dollars (and maybe even trillions)
other examination will fail. Say, an analysis by Economics will
lead to meaningless results, since is the level of secondary
and, in especially small businesses - that is, larechnikov
level, managers and clerks. C any idea now worn Americans
(Like a chicken with egg)? This idea of missile defense -
about I-net'e has long been forgotten. Meanwhile, problems of
information technology for some reason, discussed in connection
with: ABM. What is the connection? Well, for starters, defense
is irrelevant to the real needs of defense USA. This is only a
pretext, screen, "PR". All These "rogue states", International
terrorism, etc., etc. - It's just
rhetoric. All that really exists in one form or another, in one
way or another sense. But the "peg" to the ABM artificially
- It is far-fetched. AMD makes no
attitude to solving these problems, but on the contrary, will
only complicate the problems. So why need a missile defense?
These questions are asked and America (Source: "KD" № 123 dated
08/07/2000). Below is the view of Professor Theodore Pestola: :
A system designed to protect against nuclear attack, is not
able to distinguish the warhead from the moulage. I contend
that we are talking about THIS FRAUD. In scientific terms, I
The comparison, which will close and Russian clear: we are
talking about such chemto Lysenkoism. "You can certainly spend
not b. + l *. estimated 60 billion and much more, but much good
it still will not. It's a giant Bluffing (similar to
"Comintern" and "Information Technologies" - (c) Nemo). About
the need for funding of the fundamental cycle in the economy.
Must somehow use "bind" the money. And that, as a rule, the
military investigation. Thus: 1) U.S., in fact, recognize that
the real capital intensity of information technology
negligible compared to the
amount of funds that were held there. I think that is quite
convincing explained Bill Gates to Bill Clinton, when
they are for some reason MET. ABOUT BORN idea just then.
2) the U.S., in fact, recognize that the funds will be used
not in INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - as if in
them, without any commercial prospects in the near future.
3) the U.S., in fact, set a world community to face the fact
that: either the world economy is collapsed, and it will to the
World Depression. Either the U.S. will be given opportunity to
invest this money in the long run in its economy. This
ultimatum. Now as to why this do not say on television. Imagine
the following situation. Rises once in the morning, the PC-shny
lamer, all night prodolbavshiysya on the keyboard, or the
clerk, who its RS-ke no soul denotes and is equipped with / a
(e ( b `(g% a *.) attachment to him, and turns on the TV. And
he's plain language - For example, the program "Good Morning" -
pose the above three points. Habitual thought, "And if I might
not drink coffee?" replaced $ `c #.), - namely:" How to stuff
face "- a) the one who seduced his PC components (ie
he sold it)
b) the one who decided to make
The official doctrine of the PC platform - and
it thus framed. Will not even
any period of fermentation. People simply
get up and go. If we consider the degree lamerizatsii /
Lumpenization RS-ka, a serious social upheavals are inevitable.
Therefore, the program "Good Morning" to you again promoyut
brains about I-net'a. You can then drink the coffee. This
the first reason. The second reason is that
America is impossible not to love - tremulous
love the creditor against the debtor. America loves the whole
world community. But let us return to Spectrum'u and
Spectrum-networks (S-networks). What conclusions can be drawn
in relation to Spectrum'u based on
assumption of truth of the above?
1) The distance from
RSplatformy and I-net'a, in particular. Ie
use them only where it is unavoidable.
2) PR-pressure, and accordingly, psychosis, will be gradually
reduced, so the induction of S-networks will be weakened. From
the standpoint of lamer it would be be perceived as lowering
the tone and motivation in networks dizorientatsiya. Degree
clouded will decrease. 3) The share of operating costs
associated with RSkomponentami in networks will increase. This
will occur for the following reasons: 1. Exit PC platforms to
the real level of cost. At this point, in By pyramidality / +
bd. `, k, and upgrade active in state institutions (the
all% i% continues, though went to
decline) costs are understated.
2. The Law of Silicon Valley start working in the opposite
direction. Due lower production volumes will grow
cost (about 15% for each
twofold decrease in). What is already
occurs. Information: (KD "№ 135, Wednesday,
07.26.2000) "published earlier this week in the U.S. figures
indicate that that the supply of personal computers
2 quarter decreased by half compared with
same period last year. "-
ie cost, as a system, a set of parameters (namely, it involves
the law in Silicon Valley - but not the volume of a single
enterprise) has increased by 15% per year. 3.2. The strong
dependence of S-networks from PC platforms and PC forms (heroin
traffickers). It is no secret that the sites / servers
S-networks are implemented on RSkah - properly and the owners
of servers targeted at PC companies, as depend on them,
hardware. Spectrum-BBS still are not full BBS, since, due to
absence of Axis, are unable to perform operations on files.
Some proliferation and expansion of this type of networking
Russian hinterland is simply impossible - there is no RS-ers,
nor Inet'a. So, based on such a structure can neither expand
the market, much less creating a single global Ssetki.
S-Network this kind are bound to the locality.
3.3. Bias and control
S-nets. Some special democracy
networks, and S-networks (in particular) are not
more than visibility. The audience really given the opportunity
to produce chimeras quite a ".!.$-., - but that's because they
have no relation to the reality. And why not 'b `# (" nb
anybody's interests. Moreover, the greater the chimeras, the
more hit on the money. This profitable. Therefore, the PC
companies are not interested in some quality improvement
information exchange in networks - and the fact more,
S-networks. PC firms use S-net as a plunge pool / septic tanks,
where customers (as long as potential) are
On rearing and maturing as buyers RS-ers. In such a structure
is senseless to invest, because one way or otherwise, sooner or
later, will be in the pockets of PC vendors. System, in the
final account is closed on them. Easier to throw money out the
window, or just give them RSfirmu. Bias networks is also
evident in the fact that any information compromising
potroniruyuschuyu RSfirmu firm in the best case occurs
with hostility, at worst - is destroyed. In the best just
ignored. Manageability of networks by means of clerks
patronized RSfirmy that softly and gently manipulate objects
idle talk, as well as sisokov that hardware dependent. They
will gladly help you get lamer PSU PC, PC-modem, PC enclosure,
FC1, 44 MB - 3,5 "floppy drive, etc. and so on - is gradually
training the customer buy food at the right
place. By that time, whenever he wants to buy a PC monitor and
RSmaterinskuyu fee, the client already knows for sure where to
go and bring my money. Maybe it good - but these people and
this structure is not Have no relation to Spectrum'u -
and if (they have, it is very peculiar.
Are parasites. They view the Spectrum
as a thoroughfare, and even not lift a finger to create
something, something bring, such as to improve the situation -
not to mention investing their own money
or labor. Psychology is such - the very atmosphere of networks
- that it is the object and purpose of management.
3.4. Impending introduction of hourly pay for a phone.
Actually, deloto already settled - the question when. XTR2 (the
guys who bought out the production of XTR-modems) have already
announced that a cease their release and are going to shift to
post-mail (ie, read, technology shells tekstonositeley). If we
speak generally, it does not katostrofa. Just lamer cut from
the freebie - telephone channel with a symbolic payment, which
is significantly below cost. In fact, it practically does not
impact on individual users, as such, virtually none.
Positioning RSka as Home Computer'a - it just a bluff. It also
has no relation to reality. 90% of users
PC platforms are "styrennye" piecemeal
work with MS-ki; I-net, payable by the employer (regardless of
whether he knows or not your employer or the employer is a
friend who is always ready to do a service), support again at
the place work (ie, consumables, consulting, repair, upgrade).
Therefore, the Indeed, the introduction of povremennki lead,
primarily to an increase OVERHEAD COSTS OF EMPLOYERS - because
source of freebies out there. As they say, bring to the work
each nail - you're the boss here, and not guest. And bear. So
much so that the overhead jump $. 800 1000%. In this case,
start conversations that labor productivity in Russia is lower
than what in the U.S. as much five times. In reality, only a
2-3. But at the expense of another, not of Western ways of
distribution of the total social product, existing as the
fundamental economic reality and commonly referred to as theft
and corruption (and sometimes public consumption funds,
sometimes the shadow economy, some misuse of funds)
Any /. / kb * (pull up his ears "Russia's economic reality of
the western theoretical models lead to lush
the flowering of the most theft and corruption. Ie first
whoredom - false theories, false beliefs, heresy, then
consequence - theft, ie, material obogoschenie by falsity of
these theories in relation to Russian reality.
And Gaidar, in his time, like a real communist, with manic
persistently tried to fit the Russian reality to Western
standards, just as those Communists who at the beginning of the
century tried to "adjust" its communist Russia under the
scheme. In information technology approaches are absolutely the
same. The result of Potemkin villages. Meanwhile
always easier to adjust and most importantly, useful, a theory
for the reality rather than a reality under the theory. Thus,
employer will be put before the fact introduction povremenki
and, accordingly, growth in overhead costs. Of course, he
wants to get something in return, ie REGULAR compensate losing
money. AND here he has several degrees of freedom.
1. The first thing that comes to mind, mb. "Push" Terms and
Conditions. If we are subordinate to the clerk pilferers and
freeloader, then we can take this this, increase the degree of
exploitation. Offer, for example, to work overtime, or ignore
health requirements or impose additional duties kakieto. And
the clerk will not refuse. So it depends - on your own as
freebies.
2. Second. You can try to shift from dividends received by
procurement of office equipment (and support)
Income from other areas - at least
opportunities, reducing expenditure on
office equipment. Area, not far behind
in terms of passing funds% retracement, and that the risk /
'(this - it's construction, for example. In Stroycomplect can
"uryt" any amount, good walking Excavators still missing. This
idea ingeniously developed our mayor Yakovlev. Creatively
developed the slogan Yeltsin Buy Russian goods and by creating
their own, homebrew and simple as a penny, a theory which,
however, better fit the Russian reality than all Western
together. Our esteemed mayor reasoned that if they believe -
and this fundamental reality, and not some grimaces transition
- that let him believe INSIDE metropolis - and not
withdraw money abroad through
RS-ka. And planted tsirkulyarchikom of bureaucratic Faust
rounds in Truck PC shnomu tank. Consequences have already been
discussed in one from the letters.
3. Third. Try to offset the costs from the budget. There likely
will not work. Where you sit there and slezesh. I do not think
that the government in the face Reiman zatvaet this povremenku
to /%`%+.'( Bl funds from one budget
pocket to another, from one expenditure to another. Ie it is
not realistic.
4. Fourth. Try to "break off" the price tag in the PC's
offices. For example, to change supplier. It's also not
realistic. Since own PC-shnyh offices costs (overhead) would
grow, grow, and the purchase price of the PC-ers. Most likely,
this will lead to a narrowing of the RS-Shnogh market. Of
course, PC-nye office will try to somehow resist and defend its
market. For example, try to push garlopanov (Lamer, who decided
that the PC-to - is Home Computer) on the street shouting
slogans type: "Down povremenku", "Long live
access to I-net drain. "" We demand
protect our right to buy bread and circuses. A
as an inalienable human right and
citizen as a gargle in the brains of shit ".
This has already happened. Likely that the situation will
evolve in a second direction, and partly in the first. PC shnye
clerks will be permanently enslaved (As serfs) in government
agencies and to be completely controllable. This will be
accompanied by a decrease in their status to the office of rats
due to the implementation of the second direction. Overall
Introduction povremenki significantly weaken RSplatformu and
its lobbyists delivering tangible snieniya volume khalyavnykh
resources Now that the PC-to use, but in essence, subsidized by
the state. Ie funds from RSplatformy will be removed in favor
of telephone companies, on the one hand, and
diversified into other areas of the economy - on the other hand
(due to Step 2.).
Now, how it will affect -
Spectrum.
1. There is a high probability that Ssetki
begin to fall apart, especially for
through appreciation RSsegmenta in technology
S-nets. Season Attempts to attract money
from its customers will likely
to the fact that they just run away, because
other option except freebies they do not know
- Are simply not accustomed to.
2. Maybe a slight improvement
with the creation and distribution of software, because
usual pastime in the networks will be
complicated.
3. Probably, S-Network will try to get by
adapt. However, due to the fact that
No fundamental previous work related to ideology / strategy for
further development in They do not, and they are entirely
dependent on the patron of their PC's offices, most likely
low-intensity decay. As they say, for what fought for it and
ran. Freebie tends to run out one day.
4. The situation creates good preconditions
to implement a "Technology of shells." In
general introduction povremenki
-% A *. + l *. weaken the Spectrum platform -
but this happens to a much lesser degree than for the PC
platform. First only in abstract considerations. Srplatforma
fairly well balanced and due to the predominance of negative
feedbacks is more resistant to perturbations. The impact will
be damped ie weakened. RSplatforma, in fact, the whole
based on positive feedback (the pyramid), and so destructive
the effect of introducing povremenki will be strengthened
RSplatformoy itself. In addition, Srplatforma has quite a long
natural evolutionary prehistory and better $ / B (`." - To the
Russian reality, rather than DCs. In Sp-platform, the most
vulnerable will be those segments that oriented to the Fc-and
Freestuff resources. Also creates good preconditions for the
development of domestic information technologies, and
Spectrum'a, including. Very I hope that Rayman will be
consistent and steadfast in implementing the plans to introduce
time-based charging. Unlikely whether the government would
collapse in the Fc-platform, as this can lead to social unrest.
The point, apparently, will be without fanfare, din, dust and
soot launched on the brakes. From the standpoint of lamer is a
feeling that just the weather deteriorated. Practical,
immediate efforts to impact on the network. It is true that the
company (with) Nemo in any way not trying to establish contacts
with kakieto network.
1) During the pre-sale preparation
network users to the commodification Sprinter'om, at the
request of Timothy Lano, I commented ekhi. The result was: a)
disavow Dennis Parinova b) neutralize General Discussion Ivan
Mac in) to prevent massive hit users
this is bullshit. A could not have to. C
the very beginning! k +. It is clear that the idea is doomed to
failure. It was enough to simply IGNORED happened in the
networks. The result, in terms of firms' earnings
(C) Nemo, would be the same. Ie IT
WAS an act of charity (Goodwill). 2) Next, I called up to
napisatelyami MMD. Discussed two points: 1) BBS Software should
be based on the OS, it is desirable to ISDOS'e (for lack of a
OS'i, even so). Napisatel MMD with This a. # + a (+ ao. But
now, two years like - and things there. And yet
S-network is much more painless to have survived the
introduction of hourly pay. A Now generally it is not clear -
will survive whether S-network or not. Did the man of the future
Their networks and, if thought, what place? Or do I have to
call him every day, and gouge him temyachko - can be think I
have other things to worry not. 2) It was invited to comment
ekhi. CHARGE with voices, followed by padding on the phone at
the rate of half an hour-hour a week. Also passed - no
reaction. And fact is, in essence, subsidizing the network. On
Currently the average salary in St. Petersburg,
approximately, 2800 p / month (at
26/07/2000). Divide by the norm of hours per month: 2800/167 =
16.8 p / hr. Multiply by # of weeks: 16.8 x 52.1 = 876 rubles.
And this at least, because they do not take into account
overhead. Thus, the network offered GRANTS
in the amount of rubles a year. Fools poherili this proposal
with a clear conscience. In general, the network exists an
unspoken rule of equal correspondents.
Full equality. And yet it is the greatest folly. Correspondents
in the network have different informational value,
as information provided by them, differs both in quantity and
quality (namely: efficiency, reliability and relevance). In
addition, various correspondents may be% i%
and different status. In real life the same way
For example, the correspondents of the hunt for sources of
information - and not vice versa. If the source of the
information provided "Advertising information", ie brings
Network NOISE, distorts information, then he had already
hunt for the correspondents. That is why the PQ-clerks of the
patron of RSkontory and are willing to work in networks under
Fairness. They have a real commercial from this output. Trying
to get by develop Spectrum (not parasitize
on it as it makes the PC-clerks) by Ssetey much less lucrative
job rather than the cultivation of chimeras and vparivanie
RS-ers. Here the principle of fairness is not suitable. For the
firm (s) Nemo line, on the principle of equal, the presence of
network costs, as at least in the 15 20 thousand rubles. /
year. This is unrealistic. Such a sum can "fight off" just
parasitic on the networks (engaging in mental debilitation).
Furthermore, the principle of equal access provisions on
individual brainwashing every user of stuck there feces. Again,
this is unrealistic, because Costs money. Meanwhile, the
technology, for example "Op.Let." (Desktop / tekstonositeli)
postmail quite a pays off, because working mechanism of payment,
That can not be circumvented. Annual Budget
"Op.Let" - depending on method of counting and recorded items
of revenue / expense now ranges from 2.000 to 8.000
rub. This is a real and promising mechanism (post-mail, as
opposed to the best network technology, provides a guaranteed
return on investment money - and it is more important than
SPECIFICATIONS, because creates the conditions for their
money). 3) attempted attract Kondratieff to cooperate (by
Indeed, the rights of the co-owner) in ISDOS, to
Leontiev. This would: how to strengthen
ISDOS (as Kondratiev highly /`.#`,, (ab), and to create
conditions for introduction in the network OS'i ISDOS, because
he enjoys it "B.` (b% b.,, and, moreover, has enormous
experience in this field. Kondratyev refused. Ie would not
seriously, methodically and systematically, for the money (Ie,
responsibly and professionally) involved ISDOS'om. And it is
required it is not qualified to write any programs for hire.
Apparently decided that the skin is not worth the candle. And
do not is because the freebie is flourishing -
Now Reiman and solve all the arising
questions about the freebies. With
by Kondratyev something, do something. 4)
Has been discussed with Dmitry Lomov
(XTR-modems) need to impact on
network through its authority (well, at
would, as a manufacturer of modems). For example,
through changes in the charter of the network, closer contacts
with the owners of BBS. In principle, this would, in my
opinion, his long-term interests of both manufacturer of
modems. However, the producer, he has not become, PRO modems,
he was not engaged. Considering production either as a hobby,
or as game. It seemed to me that this person can BCO time
"citified", but it was otherwise - to seduce RSkom, and annoying
failure to publications in "Sp.Exp." played
their role. It is difficult to require the person
some kind of systematic effort and work
in management, if it has eight classes of education and he has
at the time go to kindergarten, and the notion of prospects for
him exhausted by the sale of another modem. The more such work
and dangerous and difficult and at first glance as
bydto - not visible. It can not be helped
fingers like a fan, too, the steepness of visual
not enough, the prestige is not obvious - cheap popularity is
not threatened, and the fruits of $ also not obvious and
strongly delayed in time - including commercial
plan. 5) An attempt was made to organize the writing of a BBS
ISDOS. But it ended anything, including my fault -
too much promised and failed to meet its obligations. That, in
my think should be done in S-nets. General remarks. Further
considerations will be presented in a rather abstract, general
form. On the one hand, it gives a certain freedom in the
implementation in practice, on the other hand, so I do not
myself to any specific obligations - that is important, because
it binds hands. Still less should it be understood
as ponatseyu or the only true doctrine. Considerations should
be mentioned below taken as the angle of vision problems
in which their solubility is most likely. In addition, it is
necessary for coordination. Since my actions one way or
otherwise, sooner or later, here or there will be in line with
the reasons mentioned below. Ie this is a purely theoretical
development topics predictability - and, hence,
reduces risks. Sadly, however, is
it's the most deeply understood by those who
understand it and does not worth it.
So: (D - direct, direction).
A.1. As has already been written, it is necessary to distance
themselves from the PC-platform and Inet'a. Try to minimize the
PC segment in the Stehnologiyah. This will improve the stability
networks and prevent the withdrawal of money and other
Resources RSplatformu. It is very important.
Inet, for example, in the limit, just as
transport layer. Assuming the contrary, it is easy to see that
lost any usefulness S-networks (well, `'"% for PC firms - but
that the firm (s) Nemo has no relations, and to Spectrum'u,
perhaps, too). S-net can be regarded as no more than the
orthogonal complement I-net'a.
A.2. Must somehow increase
quality, level and quantity of information "networks. This
organizatsionnostrukturnaya problem.
E.3. Should try to somehow tie
separate grids into a single structure and
create conditions for further spread (translation in space)
network structures.
S.4. Information circulating in networks
should have a predominantly text
nature or character of the executable files.
S.5. Must somehow protect the capital
(Ie USERS USING MONEY)
and the accumulated resources Spectrumplatformy
from the destruction of networks. This is due to:
D.5.1. Spill-proof people. resources, technology, money in the
PC platform.
D.5.2. Subject to copyright. That
formal approach, which is available at
Currently the networks inefficient. The existence and nature of
the technical means of networks, as well as their structure in
practice contribute to and provoke the theft of
programmers, regardless of good intentions and the declared
value (for example, in the charter, either by word of mouth
from Season). This applies to the purely formal side, a literal
understanding of copyright. C On the other hand the networks do
not understand what in fact copyright protected not ideas and
not the code, and their implementation, ie Goods like forms of
capital, ie nested money. If you develop this idea a few
further, it turns out that the same protection should not only
use "B.` a *.% reward a programmer, but
and structure / distribution mechanism,
distribution, ordering software. Otherwise
even formal adherence to copyright
(Ie the guarantee of receiving compensation
programmer in 5-10% of the price of the drive
August 2000 approximately 5,060 Rub. ie 2,5
- 6 rubles. with a copy) will not leave even the programmers a
chance to get accruing remuneration. If '% of the network
believe that it's not worth the money, then let them try
perform this part of the costs themselves, ie LEAD its
databases. But they something on it do not go. And do not go
because it costs money. You can call it
cunning, but it will be mild. Example: a widespread
misconception that frriwa'chnoe spread HARDLY AT ALL worth the
money. Yet it costs almost as much as the author and soft (but
excluding royalties). There is the price of storage,
advertising, printing catalogs, ordering, - not to mention the
price bisket and copying (this is, indeed, a network
may Debit from the price, but it is not more than
1525% of the resulting price). Result
is that due to the fall of the availability of software, its
volume over the past few years has fallen several times. This
general considerations. Now, specific (T - tool, instrument):
T.1. Maximum systemic effect has promotion OS'i. Try to justify:
T.1.1. Substantially narrows the PC segment in the
S-technologies (see Section A.1.)
T.1.2. Through the standard and universal OS'i it is possible
to create databases, increased interoperability of files (both
within the site, and in structure of nodes, ie in the network
ab `c * bc`%) (see Section D.2)..
T.1.3. By reducing the criticality of the hardware file under
OS'yu can try to implement Section E.3. T.1.4. Technology
shells. It is no secret that now the S-network kusochnorazryvny
and do not form a continuous coverage and uniform information
space. Or, in other words, there is no a single operating
network space. Shell can associate these fragmentary pieces of
at least laskutnoe blanket. If the shell is used as a "chassis"
ISDOS, it is ! A. + nb-. operable. And in the network
space can be included on
Post-mail'u nodes do not have access to the tel. network, not
to mention about Inet'e. This corresponds to item A.3. On the
other hand, Again, because of the absolute interoperability
through converters ISDOS'a can result in the transport layer
I-net'a. Ie Wednesday becomes one.
T.2. Changing the statutes networks.
T.2.1. Rule fairness. With him
something must be done. This type of equality leads to
skotobaze. Without ceremony You can get the situation in
perspective, when the network will literally
Pets are only the older group of kindergarten. The action of
this principle leads to the degradation of networks. On the
other hand, it is a very sensitive issue. He
directly related to censorship and the manipulation of the
network or her addiction. Therefore, early maturing and hasty
decisions likely will harm than good. For example, the
introduction of charging for the money could easily lead to
manipulation mass consciousness on the part of wealthy
individuals (regardless of physical or legal, representing the
#. Aab `c * bc` k, businesses, civic organizations or
politicheskireligioznye (sectarian) public education). This is
the Achilles' heel of the same I-net'a. Meanwhile, billing is
very effective. Index IQ user, as when it comes to the contents
of his pockets, jumping at least twice - Yes, and chimeras, in
part, fly around. So the question is who to whom, how and what
to pay. In my opinion, should always pay the person receiving
the information. In fact, your money and you must determine the
nature of information resources online. This is directly
associated with A.2. At present, S-network is mainly
represented by users who not materially wealthy, - at breakfast
not much to save, and the amounts allocated for spending are
limited. Therefore, there is another approach. Type "corvee.
Coley are using network resources, whether nice work out. In
particular, as an example, sysop easily can (and should!)
pripahat user which in itself is of no interest as a source of
information on extraction of the information itself. Such
ballast, not being involved in the production information, in
fact, it turns out boarder, but still bargain and noise
generator. Ie objectively reduces the quality of detail. space.
This should be replenished. Now the magnitude of payment
(regardless of what it is calculated - workdays kilobytes of
information, or rubles). There are two parameters that are
generally inconsistent. This amount of information (such as
instant total volume of information circulating
the local grid) (quality of information
(Namely, its efficiency, reliability and relevance). When free
nature I do not want to go into details formulation of the
problem - I note only that most primitive form, this linear
programming problem (transport problem). If we assume that the
structure is not linear (and it is likely so) it will challenge
the calculus of variations. We are not talking about getting
some kind of quantification (final) result, but rather on the
mathematical type of the object with which we have to case. It
is possible that the optimal size of payment will be that at
which volume of circulating information falls
twice with respect to the free version,
- Anyway, it can be taken
As an initial approach to interatsionnom process. I want to
emphasize that Payment is considered here not in terms
of view of someone's selfish interest or
economic considerations, as well as plain
Technical parameters optimizing the exchange of information -
that is, we are talking about some norm.
T.2.2. Requirement compliance.
In my opinion should be gently but strongly promote ISDOS, -
and this should be accounted for in the statute. Kulibinstvo
and rukosuystvo in matters of standards bring more harm than
good. The ideal option would be one in which the public will be
concerned about it and the actual information in the network,
not the method and technical aspects of Sseti. Standards - the
case of professionals. Also in the statute Ssetey should be a
clear indication of the TV-standard and its derivatives. For
example, the format of the text screen (the number of a (,".+."
and rows in the screen). Needless fooling users
imaginary advantages of PC-display in
Spectrum'e. This is directly contrary to Section
A.1. and E.3. (On the village dumps monitors do not occur).
Indirectly, this also contradicts Section A.2. and S.4. N. Now
on a common policy form (s) Nemo on networks at the moment
(H-about Himself). H.1. Direct investment of money in
network is now impossible. Reasons include:
N.1.1. While the S-network is the patron of
PC company (and in fact, a parasite), any
money invested in the network will be assigned
PC company. It's the same thing as flushing
the street - or throw money away.
That's why I, for example, refused to
production modems XTR.
N.1.2. State networks is now such that
they first need to decide for themselves some
problems in order to improve their
attractive and promising -
only then can we talk about production. Without a network of
manufacturers not do. Kulibinstvo and rukosuystvo absolutely
hopeless - and only slightly slow the degradation. Doubt
ktolibo that will now buy Modems (Taking into account the
impending povremenki) to rinse their brains in the sludge that
Available networks.
H.2. Ability to work on the roundabout ways that are indirectly
related to the network, but nevertheless very important for
her. It is primarily the direction in which the patron of the
RS-firm is not able, for one reason or another, assign someone
else's the money invested. They can be called dual-use
technologies.
N.2.1. First and foremost is to promote OS'i
ISDOS.
N.2.2. Technology development and shells
post-mail'a.
N.2.3. Improvement of hardware (motherboard) in the direction
of maximum efficiency OC'i. In the light of above, I think, it
makes no sense to explain how it relates to the S-networks.
Also, I think it bears noting that the firm (s) Nemo is in a
hurry. And therefore, if the S-network will persist in its
Durkee, it will be busy waiting attitude - namely, will have to
wait for the fruits of those stupid things that there are
cultivated, - namely, destruction of S-networks, available at
the moment. After that is likely to intensify in Postmail
ISDOS'e, and he may already be used as a base to create new
networks - already ISDOS'e. Parasites planned to cut right on
the threshold of a bright tomorrow. In the meantime, let them
live. When creating new networks into account the experiences
available at the moment Ssetey and their errors. This is a
pessimistic scenario. Very Hopefully, however, that the
available figures in the S-networks from which anything
depends, shall instruct and take appropriate action. That
should do it they are - a form (with) Nemo is no help here
can.
Well, finally, a concrete response to the letter. Without the
above, I think it would have seemed meaningless to you. Also
let me note that I am not a fan of write such treatises - is
very nedno, - and the time lost (three working
DAYS) - but it is necessary. To better
understanding. Thus, hereinafter
letter:
"There is a network Fidonet" - more precisely, conditional
See: Butt inefficient and Fido has
80 characters per line - requires
/% `% D.`, b (`." Bl. OS'i Without a very
time-consuming - requires a gateway. In addition,
All pseudographics practiced in Fido,
flies under the cat's tail.
"We need a modem capable of installing
connection with a modem PC. "I think that this should occur at
the sysop (gateway), rather than directly to users. Too
expensive - is exclusive.
"Circuits Kondratyev and Shepeleva" - is Kulibinstvo,
kustarschina. Users can do it, but I got to do with it? Their
Durkee - THEIR PROBLEMS.
".. Is not supported by (guaranteed) -
this is easily cost over the bus (there is a
mind guarantee). In addition, as far as I
known scheme Kondratiev - is not that
other than the BUS ADAPTER. Another thing
that as a result - a barn. And for the alteration
requires fairly ": hardening, sharpness,
workout. "In large numbers it is unreal. Also, I know that
change is needed in the firmware ROM.
": There is a workable network
Software under ISDOS - mailer Dickie ". Exist, then he can, and
there, but its demand (frequency of use) and support about the
same as CP / M - ie, Software vrodeby there, and seemingly
and not: Unfortunately, no one uses them. Ie no experience in
the use and support. In the form of an order I can not
compel the public to use it.
Someone needs to push it, to accumulate
experience, to replicate: The only thing I can do in this case
- is to try and change the preferences, such as interest
ISDOS'om - not more than that. Looking for people who have these
specifically engaged. I can not do
that work for them - himself. By the way, read Bashu floppy
failed: Is there help'y there? Description?
: Support any of the circuits connect the modem: "How can I
support? Generally, the purpose of E-Mail address
producer (manufacturer) modems -
it is his headache - and misrepresented the number of
compatibility. This internal standards - the company which
produces modems. Except when they use OS'i this problem does
not exist. There is a descriptor device and device driver: If
You mean propaganda Kulibinstva -
it is again, not me. Another thing
now nobody produces modems, but
the fact there are other, more compelling reasons.
The solution may be an external modem through
RS232. In this case, at least
disappear constructive layout
problems. Relatively higher price
external modem - is a secondary thing. Buying a modem - is a
one-time payments - and glitches when working with the barn and
the inconvenience of its use - it regularly hemorrhoids.
Requires "pile" adapter for RS232. For qualified specialist
does not think it will be a big problem. But this is again
Kulibinstvo, of course, if someone does not start do m
