... Network mess ...
$% Nemo, 2000
Reporter: On the question of networks and network software.
At this moment for those who work on the Spectrum, available
network Fidonet. To work in this and other networks, such as
local ZXNet, have the appropriate software.
Situation is more complicated with iron. For the network
Fidonet need a modem that can communicate with a modem PC. On
Currently there are two solutions to this problem. This scheme
Kondratyev and Shepeleva. But the connection of the PC modem to
a computer KAY requires self-assembly scheme, which is not
available everyone and is not supported by the company
(guarantee).
At the same time, there is a workable network software under
IS-DOS - mailer Dickie. Thus, if a firm Nemo
support any of the circuits connect the modem:
a) Finally there is the application of IC RTC DALLAS
b) A network access at Sinkleristov, and this, without
doubt, good.
a) will increase ranking and popularity among the machines
KAY users. In addition to Mailer, it would not be superfluous
to write a convenient editor for mail under ISDOS (a la Lara
Cnoft under TrDos). All necessary I am ready to provide
descriptions.
<...>
Nemo: read with interest your letter. I want to note
the following:
1. Specificity of the network as an information space.
Networks are now working as amplifiers chimeras. The scheme
is simple: there is A user with stupidity in the head X, and
have a user in a stupidity in my head D They are joined in a
network and vzaimoobogoschayutsya : as a result of
each head - both A and B - sits on two stupid: X and Y.
With proper chimera underneath it send
some bullshit. There is a commercial return. Then comes
sobering, and it all starts on the new. Chimeras can be
manage. Respectively, and to ensure a regular flow
money (a tax on stupidity).
I do not see any way of sublimation / enrichment media
networks. They all have to be taught at the institute for five
years, - and that is not enough.
If a person does not have a practical, PROFESSIONAL
relationship to the subject - its weight - as a source
information - tends to zero. Ie an ideal generator
noise. Moreover, it is not responsible for their words. Even
correct information being placed in the wrong context for it,
becomes noise. Missing a single
ideology / methodology, which would sublimate information.
Professionals is not there - some scammers (it's one of
those that work for money or for other consideration). I do not
see structures and methods of their construction, which would
reduce the entropy networks. Network degenerate.
2. The impact of networks on the platform.
Networks provide increased consumer content companies - but
only in the short term, because the essence of this increase
is resources, ie, use
information resources without their resume to:
a) they do not belong;
b) they are not satisfied (ie, the long-term network
contribute to weakening Spectrum'a;
c) they are destroyed.
Example 1. Distribution software.
There are a trader, has his work is its database
(The actual software, clients, programmers), established
contacts (Structure). Appear online. As a result, volume sales
are falling in N times, where N is the average number of users
on the local grid. The trader goes bankrupt. Ie network is
filled with software by resources (capital) trader. But it does
not make them. As only traders are ruined, the network remains
soft. Availability software is determined not only by its
quantity, but also complexity access.
Without a database trader, in which systematized
software, we can assume that this software or not. I somehow
have not heard that the networks had their own database of
suitable capacity, - they are not AS THEY COST MONEY, and the
network to pay is not accepted.
Example 2. Composition and age of the owners of BBS.
A friend of mine took a little research into Fido.A
Specifically, he decided to find educational qualification and
age owners of BBS, and oposlya compared it with the situation
ten years Period.
Total: average age of owners of BBS around 18-23 years,
v. 30-35 ten years ago. It is clear that on the educational
status, and even less about the professionalism to say no
sense. I doubt that users Spectrum'e represent
greater informational value for each other than in Fido (speech
talking about ZXnet).
How did it happen?
Meanwhile, the process is completely objective. Network,
then nonprofit, which means that the winner is the one
Who gets more information than it provides. Ie,
Roughly speaking, the more stupid operate smarter,
educated and informed - it does not make up for -
except that increasing noise (entropy) in information
space.
As a result, more clever escape from networks, and more
stupid Conversely, come - that somehow -
FREE, of course. And a grid of sufficiently informed,
skilled and professional community has degenerated into
group of teenagers, tormented by his own chimeras to
the reality of having to do with (you can call her and older
a group of kindergarten).
Ideal environment for catching fish in muddy water. Ie for
ten years - the capital of the network - namely, qualified her
part - was simply destroyed, drive, life is NOT
Replenish.
3. The prospect of networking Spectrum'e.
Very interesting question, because is whether
implementation of some projects in the network investment of
money and in general Systematic work in this direction.
3.1. Induced character Spectrum'ovskih networks.
In fact, grids - this is a reaction to the
aggressive, inadequate advertising by IBM, which is known to
Inet proclaimed its strategic direction.
To brainwash (PR-technologies) are big money -
Of course, somebody starts to go crazy in the head and begins
. Activity is evident in this Spectrum'e
direction is forced, imposed by nature. (This
Incidentally, the side effects of any large-scale and massive
advertising, so to speak, waste production).
What will happen if I-net, together with the United States,
and IBM will fly into the tube together with its global scam?
And to lighten this bubble?
At first glance the question seems absurd. But this is only
first glance. When spent so much money on PR, trust
surface, a quick look dangerous. Everyday experience
misleading, because inspired.
It is very difficult to understand for Europeans and
Americans in especially since individualism, they have
extraordinary. A Individualism is supposed to complete its
opposition individuality of the surrounding world. In this
situation, see drift, shift, Shift Self practically
impossible. Self-identification is perceived as
fundamental fact, as the origin, as zero coordinates,
as an axiom.
In other words, people can not see their own
changes, both natural and externally imposed. Especially
such a change can not be deployed in time to
determine direction - where it pushes.
It is impossible to determine how distorting reality.
Moreover, changes in perception of reality is now possible in
associative perception (through the video sequence, -
technology and problems of this type of impact as old as time
and theology known as iconoclasm) and
diskursivnologicheskom (via text).
Can only hope the cerebellum, like dolphins. About
these things is hard to argue, because they are on the brink
and beyond language. Usually in such cases suggest that the
other party (the opponent) read POTENTIAL DIMENSIONS LIE, as an
example the same Viktor Suvorov (Reference: W. Rezun,
intelligence officer, received British citizenship on demand.
In absentia sentenced to death).
When a prisoner of the chimeras, also created their own
hands, tormented (mad), whole nations. And this is done
by inspiring reality, or in other words,
imposition of chimeras. Any internationalist doctrine
prepodnosimaya se - exhibits in itself, if it is slightly
poskrebsti quite mundane and mercantile national
interests. In the 30 years the whole world was raving communist
ideas and the Comintern. In fact, it was skillfully orchestrated
chimera.
The Comintern was kept at the expense of workers and
farmers, which gnoili in the camps. It is clear that, unlike
Russia, the 30's, America inflate its chimera expense of others.
In the NASDAQ (stock index) has invested around the world.
The real software companies, ie share involved already
working capital - TOTAL only a percentage of attracted
shares (ie debt) money. And now Bill Gates (losing weight is a
factor three), promises to Enable.
For people accustomed to the domestic terms, it will be
like this: there are monstrous, disproportionate with what
funds, and they must learn literally from scratch - that is,
perform an economic miracle.
Chimera also faced with the reality of the world, EVER
crumbles. There are time constants, which, although not
have a literal, physical sense (ie, are immeasurable in
SI), but nonetheless very real.
Even if you collect nine pregnant women, they do not give
birth child in a month. Whatever the big money they are not
promises.
If you look at the history, the three centuries
bogoostavlennosti Europe (Christianity in Europe beyond sugar
cubes - as a living religion - there is no longer three hundred
years - in Russia, by the way, too) give much food for thought
reflection. Creation of the Cartesian myth (Kartezy - is the
name of mathematician Rene Descartes, the Jesuits, who had never
famous for its singular depth of Christian faith) went in a few
stages. Moreover, the fruits were obtained after three
centuries (in all its entirety, as the concept of technological
progress, civilization, Western values).
The first fruits appeared only in the early twentieth
century. XIX century - a century of experiments - no more.
During the late XVI and early XVII century, developed the
doctrine, ideology, and created Esoteric (metaphorical, and
mystical) NUCLEUS Cartesian myth of mathematics, as kognetivny,
cognitive device with one hand and DELICHESKY, creating the
LOGO, on the other hand, who was able to bring forth from her
womb, a new vision reality.
In particular, only two centuries after Descartes, Auguste
Cauchy formalized the concept of the operation limit, making
it accessible to any Lameroo, regardless of its moral
ethical qualities. Prior to this notion of the limit was only
available through fasting and prayer. (For reference, the
fundamental work Descartes <Reflections on the original
philosophy> sounds Latin as <Meditationes de prima
philosophia>).
As a result, the Charterhouse of the world was gained over
than two centuries of moral and ethical foundation - and only
after This Achilles caught a turtle (an allegory of Zeno of
Elea) - and Europe New Times received gnosis (knowledge) is
greater than there were old (the same Archimedes). Ie Two
centuries of hidden, latent development, bearing the new
reality.
Communist doctrine they carry nearly a century,
before they bear fruit - and was Skorospelka -
quickly flourished - but quickly faded.
What's in information technology?
Mikakoy doctrine, a theory, not to mention
hermeneutic, esoteric nucleus. Of course, something is done
N. Wiener, something Prigogine. But in their writings Prigogine
of exploration and depth is not much different from the labor
of Descartes. Ie at the moment is nothing more than a bare idea.
Even if it has an ontological status (and is not
chimera), it can not be deployed overnight to a new world -
require an evolution - which is likely to leave CENTURY. Well,
Finally, mercantile, fiscal nature venture, which
disgusts.
Americans are very fond of Freud and Jung did not really -
but in vain. By Freud's money - it's feces.
Bill Gates recalls now Mavrodi, who took so much
money that is impossible to learn them. (He wanted them to
learn or not, whether it was the original fraud or had any
commercial prospects are, in this case is not important).
Many of the agreements, conventions, statements of a PC
platform Is arbitrary and introduced purely VOLONTORISTSKI. None
foundation of their justification. First of all, appropriate and
uniqueness.
According to Newton, in the world there are no arbitrary
decisions. Any unjustified outrage points to ignorance and being
implemented, leads to destruction is based on it
creation. And put it volontaristski doctrinal
provisions, rather than technical solutions - although, by
virtue of its is arbitrary, and they can be questioned.
Where there should be a theoretical justification alone
allegations. In other words, information technology
does not currently have no relation to science - but
Positions EXACTLY HOW TO RESEARCH, ie replicated lie. This
Recalls profonatsiyu to selling condoms with the stigma
"Checked Electronics" - a pun or "scientific communism".
Moreover, not only at the moment, but never in
the future of science in the traditional, orthodox, literally
IT WILL NOT.
Science can be defined as the cognitive (knowing, Lat.
cognitio - cognition, research) system based on
well-defined principles, WHICH CAN NOT BE MODIFIED. One of the
these principles is the separation of the knower
(Reflectors), subject and object, which is known by this
reflection. Computer in the same applications that are
implicit in the information technology, are always included in
"Loop" self-reflection. Therefore, it may not always
regarded as an object.
One thing to glasses, and quite another to glasses, dressed
to the bow. About what kind of bugs you can fuck, if prinebrech
Cartesian axiomatic knowledge in science, very good
known. Sri Aurobindo (Ghose) - a quotation from the book
"Conversations with Pavitra "(it is the Theosophical Society of
HP Blavatsky): They never gone beyond the vital plane (which in
their terminology corresponds to the astral plan).
I would also throw off the possibility of fraud (and I, for
example, in relation to information technology, would not
discard this possibility, - (c) Nemo). But here we may
dealing with involuntary self-deception [wilful self - direct],
After all, the vital plane see what they want to see mentally.
This complicated and wonderful realm where truth and
falsehood are hopelessly confused. It all seems a logical and
seductive (but ultimately illusory) form. "
As an example quoted from Wiener. The context is enough
volume, or simply do not understand what they mean. Words and
phrases highlighted in capital letters I, (c) Nemo:
"In India there is still a classic type saniyasi (Indian
monahotshelnik - (c) Nemo): However, a purely contemplative life
These elders were not able to satisfy India, which became the
mistress of their fate (it is a period of time after the English
protectorate over the former colony, after giving
independence, the 50s of the twentieth century - (c) Nemo).
In this country, still need to do much to break
vicious circle of poverty, ignorance and misery, that there can
not afford the luxury to provide capable and experienced people
opportunity to engage in saving their souls. Therefore, deep
religious desire to devote himself to the refined old
another world (we are talking about the Europeanization - (c)
Nemo) transformed alert beskorytsno serve the needs of society,
wherever necessary experience and honesty, and where there can
be no question of INDIVIDUAL INTEREST.
The Indians quickly found in his written justification for
more secular, but so closely associated with the religion of
the image saniyasi life (you can even specify where they found
- (c) Nemo - Buddhism, Mahayana, Tantra, ie the top four
chariots (-Yana Sanskrit)). Of course, it was absolutely
necessary.
No country can make suitable USE
FROM introduced from outside INCENTIVES AND METHODS Borrowing;
SOMEWHERE IN THEIR OWN TRADITIONS, IN HIS OWN
SPIRITUAL order should it find a moral force for development,
is needed to resolve new problems. "
With regard to their own traditions, they went with
Patriarch Nikon. Living Logos was destroyed. Peter epoch
did the rest. Now into the traditions can only be
by checkmate or vodka, that the public regularly and does.
Dolls, a balalaika and kokoshniki not count going.
Now about Norbert Wiener.
Characterizing the quote: "For me, the personal
interest in the development of computers took me
far beyond the circle of ideas related to past, present and
future machines made of brass, copper, glass and steel.
Human brain and nervous system in some respects as
resemble computers.
Both quotes from the book "I - a mathematician."
Now this man in America put away in a dusty chest.
We analyze the first quote. Obtain the following statement:
"Any country would make use of the MISMATCH
introduced from outside stimuli and borrowed techniques "- so
Further, according to the text. Fun game in the beads, as he
said Hesse.
In essence, this means that negated INTERNATIONAL
nature of Western doctrines - their absolute universality,
relevance and applicability. It's not even talking about
INFORMATION Technologies and their generation - RS'ke and
I-nete.
It is possible that some sort of Application can take place.
But clearly denied direct cloning of foreign regulations and
their plantation. Points to the need to develop their own
technologies. And this is sedition, heresy, the doctrine of the
all-conquering U.S. questioned.
Bad, bad for the U.S. citizen.
Another quote:
"... Ambitious people belonging to a society not
loyal, or, more elegantly, not inclined to worry
due to the fact that spending someone else's money, once feared
the scientific careers like the plague. And since the war
(referring to 1939-1945 - (C) Nemo) of such adventurers, were
getting used to stockbrokers or the clerk of the insurance
business, literally flooded science. We had to abandon many of
the old representations. We all know that scientists have their
drawbacks. Among us there were pedants, lovers of alcohol,
chestodyubtsy, but normal state of things we did not expect to
find in their midst liars and schemers. "
It's about someone are written, not about whether Bill
Gates? (Quote from there also: N. Wiener. Publishing House
"Nauka / Home Edition Physical mathematical literature. M.
1967. / Translated from the U.S. Publication: New York, 1956).
You can, of course, assume that all the above is not more
than generalities - just empty rhetoric, no specifics. On
Actually it is not. When talking about hundreds of billions of
dollars (and maybe even trillions) other consideration
IMPOSSIBLE.
Analysis by means of Economics will lead to meaningless
results, since is the level of secondary and, especially, small
business - ie, larechnikov level, managers and clerks. C
any idea now worn Americans (like a chicken with egg)? This
the idea of missile defense (missile defense), - on I-net'e
has long forgotten.
Meanwhile, the problems of information technology for some
reason discussed in connection with the defense. What is the
connection?
Well, for starters, PRO has no relation to real
U.S. defense needs. This is only a pretext, screen, "PR". All
These "rogue states", international terrorism, etc., etc.
it's just rhetoric. All that really exists in this or
different form, in one sense or another. But the "peg" to the
ABM Artificially - it is far-fetched.
PRO has no relation to the solution of these problems, but
on the contrary, will only complicate the problems. So why is
needed ABM?
These questions are asked and America (Source: "KD" N 123
on 08/07/2000). Below is the view of Professor Theodore
Pestola:
"The system, designed to defend against nuclear attack, can
not to distinguish the warhead from the plaster cast. I contend
that we are talking about THIS FRAUD. In scientific terms, I
give you a comparison, which is close and understandable
Russian: it is about something such Lysenkoism.
"You can certainly spend not only the estimated 60 billion
and much more, but much good it still will not.
This gigantic bluff (similar to "Comintern" and
"Information Technologies" - (c) Nemo).
About the need for funding of basic cycle
economy. Need to somehow use "bind" these
money. And that, as a rule, the military investigation. Thus:
1) U.S., in fact, recognize that the real capital-
Information Technology negligible in comparison with
by the volume of funds that were held there. I think that this
convincingly explained to Bill Gates to Bill Clinton, when
they are for some reason MET. ABOUT BORN idea just then.
2) the U.S., in fact, recognize that the funds will be used
NOT involved in information technologies - and if they,
then, without any commercial prospects in the near future.
3) the U.S., in fact, have put the global community with a
fait accompli, that: either the world economy is collapsed, and
it will lead to World depression. Either the U.S. will have the
opportunity to invest these money in the long run in its
economy. This ultimatum.
Now why do not they tell on TV.
Imagine the following situation. Rises once in the morning
PC shny lamer, all night prodolbavshiysya on the keyboard, or
the clerk which, in its PC-shke denotes no soul and is provided
with attachment to him, and turns on the TV. And he's plain
language - for example, in the program "Good Morning" - set out
the above-mentioned three points. Habitual thought, "And if I
might not drink coffee?" is replaced by "How stuff face "-
a) the one who seduced his PC components (ie, he sold it)
b) the one who decided to make the platform of MS OFFICIAL
The doctrine - and thereby substituted.
Will not even be any period of fermentation. People simply
get up and go. If we consider the degree lamerizatsii /
Lumpenization RS-ka, the serious social upheavals are
inevitable.
Therefore, the program "Good Morning" to you once again
promoyut brains about the I-net'a. Then you can drink
coffee. This is the first reason.
The second reason is that America can not not love -
tender love creditor against the debtor. America loves
everything the world community. But let us return to Spectrum'u
and Spectrum-networks (S-networks). What conclusions can be
drawn in relation to Spectrum'u, assuming the truth
above?
1) The distance from RSplatformy and I-net'a, in
particular. Ie use them only where it is unavoidable.
2) PR-pressure, and accordingly, psychosis, will gradually
decrease, therefore inducing S-networks will be weakened.
From the standpoint of lamer it would be perceived as lowering
the tone and motivation in networks dizorientatsiya. The degree
will be darkened decrease.
3) The share of operating costs associated with
PC components in the networks will increase. This will be
occur for the following reasons:
1. Exit PC platforms to the real level of cost. On
Currently, because of pyramidal as well as active
upgrades in government agencies (it is still ongoing, though
gone declining) cost of under-reported.
2. The Law of Silicon Valley start working in reverse
direction. Due to declining production volumes will be
increase the cost (about 15% for each two-fold reduction
volumes). What is already happening.
Information: (KD "N, 135 Wednesday, 07/26/2000)" published
in Earlier this week, the U.S. figures suggest that the supply
personal computers in the 2 quarter decreased by half
compared with the same period last year. "- ie,
cost, as a system, a set of parameters (namely, that
implied in law in Silicon Valley - rather than volume one
individual enterprises) increased by 15 percent over the year.
3.2. The strong dependence of S-networks from the
PC-platform.
It is no secret that the sites / servers S-networks are
implemented on RS'kah - Lsootvetstvuyuschim way servers and
owners are focused on PC firms, because depend on them in
hardware.
Spectrum-BBS still are not full BBS, because,
due to lack of Axis, are not able to perform operations on
files. Some proliferation and expansion of this type
networks in the Russian hinterland is simply impossible - there
is no RS-ers, nor Inet'a. So, based on this structure,
can not be any expansion of the market, much less a unified
Global S-grid.
S-net of this kind are bound to the locality.
3.3. Bias and control S-nets.
Some special democracy in networks, and S-networks (in
particular), not more than visibility. The audience really given
opportunity to produce chimeras completely free - but this is
because they have no relation to reality.
Moreover, the greater the chimeras, the more hit on the
money. This is advantageous. Therefore, the PC companies are
not interested in some qualitative improvement of information
exchange in networks - and the fact more, S-networks. PC firms
use the S-net as plunge pool / septic tanks, where customers
(as long as the potential) are "on the rearing and maturing as
buyers RS-ers.
In such a structure is senseless to invest, because they
one way or another, sooner or later, will be in the pockets
PC vendors. The system eventually closed it in
them. Easier to throw money out the window, or just give them a
PC company. Bias networks is also reflected in the fact that
Any information, compromising the patron of the RS-firm
best met with hostility, at worst - is destroyed. In
best just ignored.
Manageable networks carried out by the clerks
patronizes PC company that gently and unobtrusively manipulated
objects of idle talk, as well as sisopov that hardware
dependent. They will gladly help you get lamer PSU PC
PC-modem, PC enclosure, FC1, 44 mb - 3,5 'drive, etc. etc. -
gradually accustomed customer buy food at the right place.
By that time, whenever he wants to buy a PC monitor and
PC motherboard, the client already knows for sure where to go
and take their money. Maybe this is good - but these people and
this structure have no relation to Spectrum'u - and if
have is very peculiar. Are parasites!
They view the Spectrum as a thoroughfare, and even
not lift a finger to create something, something to bring,
somehow improve the situation - not to mention an equity
money or labor. Psychology is such - the very atmosphere of
networks - namely it is the object and purpose of management.
3.4. Impending introduction of hourly pay for a phone.
Actually, the case is already settled - the question when.
XTR2 (boys, who bought out the production of XTR-Modem) has
already announced that that stop their production and are going
to shift to post-mail (ie, read, technology, shells
tekstonositeley).
If we speak generally, it does not katostrofa. Just
lamer cut from the freebie - telephone channel with a symbolic
Payment that is substantially below cost. In fact, it
virtually no impact on individual users,
as such, virtually none. Positioning of the RS-ka like Home
Computer'a - it's just a bluff. It also has no
relation to reality.
90 percent of the PC platform users are "styrennye" on
parts of the work of MS-ki; I-net, payable by the employer
(Regardless of whether he knows or not, it's your employer or
the employer is a friend who is always ready to do a service);
support again in the workplace (ie, consumables
materials, consulting, repair, upgrade). So, in fact,
Introduction povremennki lead primarily to an increase
OVERHEAD COSTS OF EMPLOYERS - because source of freebies out
there.
As they say, bring to work each nail - you're here
owner, not a guest. And bear. So much so that invoices are
soaring! In this case, start talking about that performance
labor in Russia is lower than than in the U.S. as much five
times. But the real only 2-3.
But at the expense of another, not of Western ways of
distribution gross national product, existing as
the fundamental economic reality and is commonly called
theft and corruption (and sometimes public funds
consumption, sometimes the shadow economy, and sometimes
inappropriate expenditure).
If you pull up your ears, "Russia's economic reality
to Western theoretical models, this leads to a lush
the flowering of the most theft and corruption. Ie first
whoredom false theories, false beliefs, heresy, then the
consequence - theft, ie, material obogoschenie by falsity of
these theories as applied to Russian reality.
Moreover, Gaidar, in his time, like a real communist, with
manic persistently tried to fit the Russian
reality to Western standards, just like those Communists
that at the beginning of the century tried to "fit" Russia
under its Communist scheme. In information technology approaches
completely analogous. The result - Potemkin village.
Meanwhile, it is always easier to adjust and most
importantly, useful to create Theory of a reality than a
reality under the theory. Thus, the employer will be put before
the fact of introducing povremenki and, accordingly, the growth
of overheads. Of course, he wants to get something in return, ie
REGULAR compensate losing money. And here it is
few degrees of freedom.
1. The first thing that comes to mind is "selling" Terms
and Conditions. If we are subordinate clerk pilferers and
freeloader, it is possible, using this, increase the degree of
exploitation. Offer, for example, work overtime, or ignore the
health requirements, or lay kakieto additional
responsibilities. And the clerk did not refuse. So it depends -
on its own as a freebie.
2. Second. You can try to shift from
dividends received by the procurement of office equipment (and
its accompaniment) on income from other areas - at least
opportunities, reducing expenditure on office equipment. Area
not far behind in terms of receiving the funds - is
construction, for example.
In Stroycomplect can "uryt" any amount, good walking
Excavators still missing. This idea is brilliantly developed our
Mayor Yakovlev. Creatively developed the slogan Yeltsin Buy
Russian goods and by creating their own, homebrew and simple as
a penny, a theory which, however, BETTER
Meet Russian reality than all the Western, along
combined.
Our esteemed mayor reasoned that if they believe - and this
is Fundamental reality, and not some faces transition
period - let believe INSIDE metropolis - and do not take
money abroad via the RS-ka. And threw out tsirkulyarchikom
bureaucratic Faust cartridge in the truck PC shnomu tank.
Consequences have already been discussed in a letter.
3. Third. Try to offset the costs from the budget.
There likely will not work. Where you sit there and
slezesh.
4. Fourth. Try to "break off" the price tag in the PC's
offices. For example, to change supplier. It's also not
realistic. Since own PC-shnyh offices costs (overhead) would
grow to be to grow and purchase price of the PC-ers.
Most likely, this will lead to a narrowing of the RS-Shnogh
market. Of course, the PC-nye's office will try to somehow
counteract and to protect its market. For example, try to push
garlopanov (lamer, who decided that the PC-to - is Home
Computer) to the street shouting slogans like: "Down
povremenku", "Yes Live access to I-net drain. "" We demand to
protect our right to buy bread and circuses. As well as an
inalienable right man and the citizen as to rinse the brains of
shit ".
This has already happened. Likely that the situation will
develop in a second direction, and partly in the first. PC shnye
clerks will be permanently enslaved (as serfs)
in state institutions and to be completely controllable. This
will be accompanied by a decline in their status before the
office rat due to the implementation of the second direction.
In general, the introduction of povremenki significantly
weaken PC platform and its lobbyists at the expense of
significant reductions in the volume khalyavnykh resources that
are PC-to use, and in fact, Subsidized by the state. Ie funds
from the PC platform will be withdrawn in favor of phone
companies, on the one hand, and diversified into other areas of
the economy - on the other hand (Due to step 2.).
Now how this will affect the Spectrum.
1. There is a strong probability that the S-grid start
apart, primarily due to increased cost PC segment in the
Technology S-nets. Attempts sisopov draw money from their
customers will likely to the fact that they simply
scatter, because other option except freebies they do not know -
simply are not accustomed.
2. Maybe a slight improvement with the creation and
distribution of software, because habitual pastime in networks
will be complicated.
3. Probably, S-Network will attempt to somehow adapt.
However, due to the fact that no fundamental Backlog of
ideology / Strategies for further development they do not, and
they all dependent on the patron of their PC's offices, most
likely low-intensity decay. As they say, what have fought for
it and ran. Freebie tends to run out one day.
4. The situation creates good preconditions for the
implementation of "Technologies of shells."
In general, the introduction of povremenki weaken Spectrum
platform - but it happens to a much lesser extent than
for the PC platform. First of all, from abstract considerations.
S-platform is well balanced and due to
predominance of negative feedback is more resistant to
perturbations.
The impact will be demorfirovano, ie weakened.
PC platform, in fact, all built on the positive feedbacks
ties (the pyramid), so the destructive effect of introducing
povremenki will be amplified most PC platforms. In addition,
S-platform has a fairly long-NATURAL
evolutionary-history and are better adapted - to the Russian
reality, rather than PC-SC.
The S-platform will be those most vulnerable segments
that focus on RC-K and Freestuff resources. Also
creates good preconditions for the development of domestic
information technologies, and Spectrum'a, including. I'd like to
hope that Rayman will be consistent and adamant
plans the introduction of hourly pay.
It is unlikely that the government would collapse in
RC-platform, as this may lead to social unrest.
The case is likely to be without too much noise, din, dust and
soot launched on the brakes.
From the standpoint of lamers will feel that just the
weather deteriorated. Practical, immediate attempts to influence
on the network. It is true that the company (with) Nemo in no
way tried to establish some contacts with the network.
1) During the presales network users to
merchandising Sprinter'om, at the request of Timothy Lapo, I
ekhi comment. The result was:
a) disavow Dennis Parinova;
b) to neutralize the General Discussion of Ivan Mak;
c) prevent a massive hit users
this is bullshit.
A could not have to. From the outset it was clear that
scheme is doomed to failure. It was enough to simply ignore
happened in the networks. The result, in terms of firms'
earnings (C) Nemo, would be the same. Ie It was an act
Charity (GOODWILL).
2) Next, I called up to napisatelyami MMD. Discussed two
paragraph:
a) BBS software had to be based on the OS, it is desirable
to IS-DOS'e (for lack of a OS'i, even so). Napisatel
MMD agreed with this. But now, two years as - as the WHO and
now there. Meanwhile, S-network is much more painless
would have survived the introduction of hourly pay. And now all
clear survive if S-network or not.
Did this person about the future of their networks, and if
thought in what place? Or do I have to call him every day and
gouge it temyachko - you'd think I have other things to worry
not.
b) It was suggested ekhi comment. FREE, with voice and
follow-padded on the phone at the rate of half an hour, hour
week. Also passed - no reaction. And yet this, in
actually subsidizing the network. At the moment, the average
salary in St. Petersburg, approximately, 2800 p / month
(26/07/2000). We define the norm hours per month: 2800/167 =
16.8 p / hr. Multiply by # of weeks: 16.8 x 52.1 = 876 rubles.
And it is at least as it does not take into account overhead.
Thus, the network offered GRANTS of $ THOUSAND
rubles per year. Fools poherili this proposal with a clear
soul!
In general, the network exists an unwritten rule of equal
correspondents. Full equality. And yet it is the greatest
stupidity. Correspondents in the network have different
information value, because information provided by them is
different as in quantity and quality (namely: efficiency,
credibility, relevance). In addition, various
correspondents may be a different status.
In real life, as, for example, reporters chasing
sources of information - and not vice versa. If the source
information provides a "promotional information", ie brings
the network NOISE, distorts, then already he hunts for
correspondents.
That is why the PC-clerks of the patron of MS-office and
willing to work in networks under fairness. They have
from this a real commercial solution. Trying to somehow develop
Spectrum (not to parasitize on it, as it makes the PC-clerks)
by S-Network to a less lucrative job rather than
cultivation of chimeras and vparivanie RS-ers. Here the
principle of Fairness is not suitable.
For the firm (s) Nemo line, on the principle of equal,
presence in the network costs a minimum of 15-20 thousand
rubles. / year. This is unrealistic. Such a sum can "fight off"
only parasitizing on networks (engaging in mental debilitation).
In addition, the principle of fairness suggests
INDIVIDUAL brainwashed to each user from
stuck there feces. Again, this is unrealistic, because Costs
money. Meanwhile, the technology, for example "Op.Let."
(Desktop / tekstonositeli) postmail completely pays for itself,
because working mechanism of payment, which can not be
circumvented.
The annual budget "Op.Let" - depending on method of
counting and taken into account items of income / expenditure
now ranges from 2.000 to 8.000 rubles. This is a real and
promising mechanism (Post-mail, as opposed to the best network
technology provides a guaranteed return of their money - and
this is MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE SPECIFICATIONS, because creates
conditions for their money).
3) attempted to draw the Kondratieff
Co-operation (in fact, the rights of the co-owner) in the
IS-DOS, to Leontiev. This would: how to strengthen the IS-DOS
(as Kondratiev skilled programmer), and to create conditions for
implementation of the network OS'i IS-DOS, because he uses it
the authority and, moreover, has enormous experience in this
field.
Kondratiev refused. Would not seriously, methodically and
systematically, for the money (that is, responsibly and
professionally) engage in IS-DOS'om. And this is what was
required, rather than qualified to write any program of
employment. Apparently decided that the skin is not worth the
candle. And it is not necessary because that the freebie is
flourishing - now Reiman and solve all the arising questions
about the freebies. However, although Kondratyev Something to
do.
4) has been discussed with Dmitry Lomov (XTR-modems)
need to impact on the network through its authority
(Well, at least as a manufacturer of modems). For example, by
changes in the charter of the network, closer contacts with the
owners BBS.
In principle, this would, in my view, it
long-term interests as a manufacturer of modems. However,
producer, he has not become, PRO modems it is not
engaged. Considering the production either as a hobby, or as
game. It seemed to me that this person can BCO time
"Citified", but it turned out differently - Tempting PC
components, and unfortunate failure of the publications in the
"Spectrum Expert" played a role.
It is difficult to claim from the man some systematic effort
and work in the field of management, if it has eight education
classes and was back in time to go to kindergarten, and the
notion of Prospects for him confined to the sale of another
modem. Especially since such work is also dangerous and
difficult and at first glance as though - not visible.
This is not helped his fingers like a fan, too, the
steepness of visual not enough, the prestige is not obvious -
not cheap popularity threatens, Bucks, and fruits also are not
clear and strongly delayed in time - including the business
plan.
5) Was an attempt to organize writing BBS under the IS-DOS.
But it ended in nothing, including my fault - too
much promised and failed to meet its obligations.
That, in my opinion, needs to be done in S-nets? General
observations. Further considerations will be described in
sufficient abstract, general terms.
On the one hand, it gives a certain freedom in the
implementation in practice, on the other hand, so I do not take
upon themselves No specific commitments - what is important,
because it binds hands. Still less should it be understood as
ponatseyu or the only true doctrine. Considerations should be
mentioned below taken as the angle of vision problems in which
their solvability of the most probable. In addition, it is
necessary for coordination. Since my actions one way or
another, sooner or later, here or there will be in line with
the reasons mentioned below. Ie this is a purely theoretical
development themes, which increases predictability - and,
hence, reduces risks.
Sadly, however, that this is the most deeply understood by
those who understand it and does not worth it.
So: (D - direct, direction).
A.1. As has already been written, it is necessary to
distance themselves from PC-platform and Inet'a. Try to
minimize the PC segment in the S-technologies. This will
improve the stability of the network and prevent withdrawal of
money and other resources in the PC-platform. It is very
important.
Inet, for example, in the limit, just as the transport
layer. Assuming the contrary, it is easy to see that lost any
feasibility of S-nets. S-net can be considered no more than
as the orthogonal complement I-net'a.
A.2. Must somehow increase the quality, level of
and the amount of the provision of information networks. This
organizatsionnostrukturnaya problem.
E.3. Should try to somehow link the disparate grid
a single structure and create conditions for further
proliferation (airing in space) network structures.
S.4. Information circulating in networks must be
primarily a text character or nature of the executable
files.
S.5. Must somehow protect the capital (ie, POWERED
USERS OF MONEY) and the accumulated resources of
Spectrumplatformy destruction networks. This is due to:
D.5.1. Spill-proof people. resources, technology, money
in PC platforms.
D.5.2. Subject to copyright. That a formal approach,
which is currently on a network is inefficient. Availability
and the nature of networking hardware, as well as their
structure practices contribute to and provoke the theft of
programmers, regardless of good intentions and declared values
(Eg, charter, or by word of mouth from the sysop). This applies
to purely formal part of the literal understanding of copyright.
On the other hand the networks do not understand what in
fact Copyright protects not ideas and not the code, and their
implementation, ie Goods like forms of capital, ie money
invested. If you develop this idea a little further, it turns
out that the same protection should benefit not only reward a
programmer, but Structure - Mechanisms for the dissemination,
distribution, systematization of software. Otherwise, even the
formal observance of copyright rights will not leave even the
programmers a chance to get accruing remuneration.
If the networks believe that it is not worth the money,
then let try to perform this part of the costs themselves, ie
LEAD Their databases. But they have something on it do not go.
And do not go because it costs money. You can call it cunning,
but it will be mild.
Example: a widespread misconception that freeware'chnoe
spread HARDLY AT ALL worth the money.
And yet it costs almost as much as the author and
soft (but excluding royalties). There is
price of storage, advertising, printing catalogs, ordering,
not to mention the price of floppy disks and copy (it's really
network may Debit from the price, but it is no more than 15-25
percent Resultant price). The result is that due to
falling availability of software, its volume over the past few
years fell several times. This general considerations.
Now, specific (T - tool, instrument): T.1. Maximum
system has the effect of promoting OS'i. Try to
substantiate:
T.1.1. Substantially narrows the PC segment in the
S-technology (see Section A.1.)
T.1.2. Through the standard and universal OS'i
it is possible to create databases, increased
interoperability of files (as in the node, and in the structure
nodes).
T.1.3. By reducing the criticality of the hardware file
under OS'yu can try to implement Section E.3.
T.1.4. Technology shells. It is no secret that now the
S-network kusochnorazryvny and do not form a continuous coating
and a single information space. Or, in other words, there is no
a single operating network space.
Shell can associate these fragmentary pieces of at least
laskutnoe in a blanket. If the shell is used as a "chassis"
IS-DOS, then it is quite operable. And in the network
space can be included on the Post-mail'u nodes do not have
Released into the telephone network, not to mention about
Inet'e. This corresponds to item A.3.
On the other hand, again due to the absolute
interoperability through the converter IS-DOS'a possible output
the transport layer I-net'a. Ie Wednesday becomes one.
T.2. Changing the statutes networks.
T.2.1. Rule fairness. With it should be something
do. This type of equality leads to skotobaze. Without ceremony
You can get a perspective of the situation where the network
will literally represented only pupils of the senior group
kindergarten. The action of this principle leads to a
degradation networks. On the other hand, it is a very sensitive
issue. He directly related to censorship and the manipulation
of the network or her addiction. Therefore, early maturing and
hasty decisions will harm rather than good.
For example, the introduction of charging for the money can
easily lead to the manipulation of mass consciousness on the
part of wealthy individuals (whether physical or
legal, representing businesses, public
organization or politicheskireligioznye (sectarian)
public education).
This is the Achilles' heel of the same I-net'a. Meanwhile,
billing very effective. Index IQ user, as soon as it
comes to the contents of his pockets, jumping at least
doubled - and chimeras, in part, fly around. So
the question is who to whom, how and what to pay.
In my opinion, should always pay the person receiving
information. In fact, your money and you must
determine the nature of information resources online. This is
directly associated with A.2.
At present, S-network is mainly represented by users,
who are not financially wealthy - not much for breakfast
save money, and the amounts allocated for spending, rather
limited. Therefore, there is another approach. Type "corvee.
Coley are using network resources, whether nice work out.
In particular, as an example, sysop can easily (and
should!) pripahat user who does not in itself
of no interest as a source of information on production
This information itself. Such ballast, not being involved in the
extraction of information, in fact, it turns out boarder, yes
bargain More and noise generator. Ie objectively reduces the
quality of information space. This should be replenished.
Now the magnitude of payment (regardless of what it
calculated - workdays kilobytes of information, or rubles).
There are two parameters that are generally inconsistent.
This amount of information (such as instant total volume
information circulating in the local area network), quality
information (that is, its promptness, accuracy and
relevance).
When free nature I do not want to go into details
formulation of the problem - I note only that in the most
primitive as a linear programming problem (transport
problem). If we assume that the structure is not linear (and it
is most likely so) it will be problem of variational
calculus.
We are not talking about getting some sort of quantitative
(Final) results, but rather on the mathematical object type,
with which to deal. It is possible that
optimal value of payment will be that at which the volume
circulating information is halved with respect to free
option - at least, it can be taken as
initial approach to interatsionnom process.
I want to emphasize that the payment is considered not in
terms of view of someone's selfish interests or economic
considerations, and as a purely technical PARAMETER, optimizing
information exchange - that is, it comes to some norm.
T.2.2. Requirement compliance. In my opinion
should be gently but strongly promote the IS-DOS, - and this is
must be considered in the statute. Kulibinstvo and rukosuystvo
in issues of standards doing more harm than good. Ideal
option would be one in which the audience will be concerned
about it and the actual information in the network, rather than
means and technical aspects of the functioning of the S-network.
Standards - the case of professionals. Also in the charter
of S-nets should be a clear indication of the TV-standard and
its derivatives. For example, the format of the text screen. No
need fooling users imaginary advantages of PC displays
in Spectrum'e. This is directly contrary to Section A.1. and
E.3. (On village dumps monitors do not occur). Indirectly, this
also contrary to Section S.2. and S.4. N.
Now, the general policy of the company (with) Nemo on
networks Currently (Nabout Himself).
H.1. Direct investment of money in the network is now
impossible. Causes following:
N.1.1. While the S-network is the patron of the RS-firm
(and in fact, parasite), any money invested in the network will
be assigned PC company. It's the same thing as flushing the
street - or throw money. That's why I, for example, refused to
production modems XTR.
N.1.2. State networks is now such that it is first
necessary to themselves to solve some problems, in order to
improve their attractive and promising - only then can
we talk about production. Without a network of manufacturers is
indispensable. Kulibinstvo and rukosuystvo absolutely hopeless
- and only significantly slow the degradation.
I doubt that anyone would now buy modems (with
taking into account the impending povremenki) to rinse my
brains in sludge that is in the networks.
H.2. Ability to work on the roundabout way, having
indirectly related to the network, but nevertheless, very much
for her important. It is primarily the direction in which
patronizes PC company is not able, for whatever reasons, to
assign someone else's the money invested. They can be called
dual technology destination.
N.2.1. First and foremost is to promote OS'i IS-DOS.
N.2.2. Technology development envelopes and post-mail'a.
N.2.3. Improvement of hardware (motherboard) in the
the direction of maximum efficiency OC'i. In the light of
above, I think, it makes no sense to explain how it has
related to the S-networks. Also, I think, is not superfluous to
note that Firm (s) Nemo is in a hurry. And therefore, if the
S-network will persist in its Durkee, it will be busy expectant
position - namely, will have to wait for the fruits of those
stupid things that there are cultivated, - namely, the
destruction of S-networks, available at the moment. After that,
probably, activated Postmail on IS-DOS'e, and he may
used as a base for creating new networks - already on the
ISDOS'e.
Parasites will be cut off right at the threshold of light
tomorrow. In the meantime, let them live. When creating new
networks will be counted experience currently available
S-networks and their errors. This pessimistic scenario. I'd
like to hope, however, that available figures in the
S-networks, on which anything depends, shall instruct and take
appropriate action. This should be done it is they - the form
(s) Nemo here to help could do nothing.
Well, finally, a concrete response to the letter. No
above, I think it would have seemed meaningless to you.
Also let me note that I do not like to write a
kind treatises - this is very tedious, - and time is wasted
(THREE Working days) - but it is necessary. For a better
understanding. Thus, hereinafter referred to a letter:
"There is a network Fidonet" - more accurately,
conventionally available: Butt inefficient, and Fido has 80
characters per line. Without this OS'i very time-consuming -
requires a gateway. In addition, all pseudographics practiced
in Fido, flies down the drain.
"We need a modem that can communicate with the modem
MS. "I think that this should occur at the sysop
(Gateway), but not directly USER. Too expensive - is exclusive.
"Circuits Kondratyev and Shepeleva" - is Kulibinstvo,
kustarschina. Users can do this, but I got to do with it?
Durkee them - their problems.
"... Not supported by the firm (guaranteed) - it's easy to
costs through the bus (referring to the guarantee). In
addition, as far as I known scheme Kondratiev - it is nothing
like BUS Adapter. Another thing is that as a result - a barn.
And for rework required fairly "hardening, ingenuity,
training." In en masse it is unreal. In addition, as far as I
known to require changes in the firmware ROM.
"... There is a workable network software under ISDOS -
mailer Dickie ". Exist, then he can, and there, but it
demand (frequency of use) and support around
is the same as CP / M - ie, Software seems to be there, but
actually no. Unfortunately, no one uses them. Ie no experience
use and support. In the form of an order I can not
compel the public to use it.
Someone needs to push it, to gain experience
use, and replicable. The only thing that I can in this
case to do - is try to change preferences, such as
IS-DOS'om interest - no more. Looking for people who
to deal specifically with this. I can not make this work for
them - himself. By the way, read Bashu floppy failed: Is there
help'y there? Description?
"... To support any of the circuits connecting the modem."
And how I support it? Generally, the purpose of E-Mail address
producer (manufacturer) modems - is it a headache -
including compatibility. This internal standards -
company, which produces modems. In addition, when using OS'i
this problem does not exist. There is a handle to the device and
device driver. If you're referring to propaganda
Kulibinstva - that is, again, not me.
Another thing is that now nobody produces modems, but the
fact there are other more compelling reasons. The solution may
be outside modem via RS232. In this case, at least, disappear
design-layout problem. Relatively higher
price of an external modem - is a secondary thing. Buying a
modem - a lump-sum payments - and glitches when working with a
barn and inconvenience use it - it regularly hemorrhoids.
"... It would not be superfluous to write," Again, we need
people, that would specifically deal with it. It's not even that
write. Must also promote, maintain, store
experience. Ie is a task for a software company. I will
very happy, if it occurs.
